Wednesday, August 20, 2025
Home Blog Page 57

Walmart’s New Partnership with TikTok and Snap Could be a Game Changer for Advertisers

0

Walmart’s New Partnership with TikTok and Snap Could be a Game Changer for Advertisers

Walmart recently announced a new partnership with two of the hottest social media platforms out there: Snap and TikTok. This partnership will enable advertisers that use Walmart Connect to buy in-stream ads on TikTok and image, AR, and e-commerce ads on Snap.

Instead of just buying ads directly on those platforms, advertisers will be able to layer on everything Walmart knows about its customers’ purchase behavior. This could be a game changer for advertisers looking to reach a wider audience.


What Does this Mean for Advertisers?
This new partnership between Walmart and TikTok/Snap could be a game changer for advertisers. Previously, if an advertiser wanted to run ads on TikTok or Snap, they would have to go through the platform’s self-serve ad interface.

Now, with Walmart as a middleman, advertisers will be able to buy in-stream ads on TikTok and image, AR, and e-commerce ads on Snap. This is a huge win for advertisers because it will allow them to reach a wider audience with their message.

In addition, they’ll be able to layer on everything Walmart knows about its customers’ purchase behavior. This data is incredibly valuable and could help advertisers create more targeted campaigns that are more likely to convert.


This new partnership between Walmart and TikTok/Snap is a big win for advertisers. It will allow them to reach a wider audience with their message and also layer on Walmart’s valuable customer data. This could help create more targeted campaigns that are more likely to convert. CMOs should keep an eye on this development as it has the potential to change the landscape of social media advertising.

Five Reasons Programmatic is Bad for Advertisers (And the Industry)

0

I’ve been doing the exchange game for a long time: I helped build the rightmedia network, which was sold to yahoo, built the Luna Network sold to Google, and even worked on the DoubleClick Exchange, EngageBDR and a bunch others. I’ve seen the technology come and go, seen exchanged turn to programmatic, seen site-specific buys come and go – and then come and go again.

It’s been a weird, long journey. So, I ask myself now, is Programmatic good for the industry? Is is it bad for advertisers? I want to examine this in a two part piece, start with the negative of the programmatic industry, the faults and what needs to be changed – and then Monday will be going into some of the benefits and forwarding thinking of programmatic.


It seems like these days, everything is automated. You can order your groceries online and have them delivered to your door without ever setting foot in a store. You can schedule your car to pick you up and drop you off without ever touching the steering wheel. So it should come as no surprise that programmatic advertising is huge. Programmatic media buying utilizing data insights and algorithms to serve ads to the right user at the right time, and at the right price. In other words, it takes the guesswork out of advertising. And if there’s one thing that CMOs love, it’s data-driven decision making.


Oh, programmatic. What could have been. We were all so excited about the potential of this new form of advertising. Finally, we would be able to deliver targeted ads to our audience at lightning speed, and we wouldn’t have to rely on those pesky humans to do it!


But, alas, it was not meant to be. As the industry has matured, the experts have noticed some serious failing of programmatic, and why it doesn’t work as well as the pundits predicted. Here are three big reasons why programmatic is failing us.

  1. Lack of Quality Inventory
    To understand why this is such a big problem, you first need to understand how programmatic ad buying works. Advertisers use software to place bids on ad inventory that they want to buy. This inventory is then bought and sold in real-time through programmatic exchanges. The problem is that the vast majority of these exchanges are filled with low-quality inventory, such as pop-ups, clickbait articles, and other non-premium placements. Only a few exchanges like Google have access to the best sites.

    In order for programmatic ad buying to work, advertisers need access to high-quality ad placements on popular websites. However, many website owners are still reluctant to give up control of their ad space to automated systems other than Google and a few large networks. As a result, the pool of available quality inventory is very small, and it’s only getting smaller as more and more advertisers move into the programmatic space.

    The biggest problem with programmatic ad buying is that it’s effectively a blind auction. Advertisers don’t know which websites their ads will end up on, and they have no control over the user experience surrounding their ads. As a result, there’s a growing disconnect between what advertisers want and what they’re actually getting.

    This lack of quality inventory is causing some advertisers to move away from programmatic ad buying altogether. These companies are instead opting for traditional methods of buying ad space, such as direct deals with publishers.. While these methods may be more expensive, they offer guarantee access to premium inventory that programmatic exchanges simply cannot match.
  2. Fraudulent Activity
    Fraudulent activity is a huge problem in the programmatic space. Since programmatic buying relies on complex algorithms to make real-time decisions, it’s easy for bad actors to take advantage of the system. For example, botnets can mimic human behavior and trick advertisers into thinking they’re getting valuable impressions when in reality they’re just wasting their money.
    Anti-fraud solutions do exist, but they’re not perfect. In most cases, they only catch a small percentage of fraudsters while also flagging many legitimate impressions as fraudulent. This creates a big problem for advertisers who are trying to reach their target audiences through programmatic channels.
  3. Viewability is Horrible on Programmatic. CMOs, are you aware of the viewability issue in programmatic advertising? If not, you should be. Briefly, viewability refers to the fact that ads are sometimes displayed on websites in a way that human consumers never see them. In the worst cases, the HTML code of the website renders the ads underneath the website’s actual content to generate impressions without a consumer ever seeing the ad. Google estimates that only 46% of online banner ads are actually viewable by consumers. That means that for every $100 you’re spending on programmatic ads, nearly $54 is going to wasted impressions.

    So what can be done about this issue? One potential solution is for ad buyers to only purchase inventory from publishers that guarantee a certain level of viewability. However, this approach has its own set of challenges. For one thing, it’s difficult to find publishers who are willing to make such a guarantee. For another, even if you do find a publisher who’s willing to make the guarantee, there’s no guarantee (no pun intended) that they’ll be able to deliver on it.

    Another potential solution is for ad buyers to work with Demand Side Platforms (DSPs) that have technology in place to measure viewability and only purchase inventory that meets a certain viewability threshold. This approach has its own set of challenges as well. For one thing, not all DSPs have this technology in place yet. For another, even if a DSP does have the technology in place, they may not be sharing data about viewability with their customers (for reasons we’ll get into later).
  4. Lack of Real Transparency. Another issue wreaking havoc in the programmatic ecosystem and having a counterproductive effect is transparency, or rather, a lack thereof, and according to a recent AOL study, it is an issue that brand executives place as the number-one challenge facing programmatic buying. In short, there is a big disconnect between what brand executives want from their programmatic buying experiences and what they are actually getting. And the main area where this disconnect manifests itself is in the issue of transparency. This lack of transparency is preventing brands from getting the full value out of their programmatic spend and is thus becoming a bigger and bigger problem.

    This is weird to me, because in 2006, when I was buying media on the RightMedia exchange, this was just as much as a problem. Networks, many of them still around today under the same or different names (many change names every 5 years to get away from bad reputation) are still around. Those same networks that cheated everyone in 2005,2006 are still pushing the same bad inventory into the ecosystem. No, really — I see some of the same exact people who were exposed as huge scammers placing their newest scams on the ecosystem daily.

    Transparency matters for a number of reasons. First, it allows brands to understand where their ad dollars are going. This is important because it allows brands to hold their programmatic partners accountable for results. Second, transparency helps brands avoid ad fraud. Ad fraud is a big problem in the programmatic ecosystem and it can have a very negative impact on campaigns. By being transparent about where their ads are being placed, brands can avoid sites that are known for ad fraud. Third, transparency helps brands improve the effectiveness of their campaigns. If brands know where their ads are being placed, they can make sure that they are being placed on sites that are relevant to their target audiences.

    The bottom line is this: transparency is important for the health of the programmatic ecosystem. Without it, brands will continue to be frustrated with their programmatic buying experiences and will eventually move away from this form of advertising altogether. This would be a shame because, when done correctly, programmatic buying can be an incredibly effective way to reach and engage with customers.
  5. All the Vanity Metrics are a Bit of a Joke. In the programmatic marketplace, it has become seemingly easy for publishers to game metrics such as click-through rates and view-through conversions. As a result, many in the industry have begun to take these “vanity metrics” with a grain of salt. In this blog post, we’ll take a closer look at some of the most commonly gamed vanity metrics and explain why they shouldn’t be given too much weight.

    Vanity Metric #1: Click-Through Rates
    Click-through rate (CTR) is a metric that measures how often people who see your ad end up clicking on it. A high CTR is generally seen as a good thing, as it means that your ad is relevant and enticing enough to get people to click. However, CTR can be easily inflated by publishers who use low-quality traffic sources or engage in other forms of click fraud. As a result, CTR should not be used as the sole indicator of an ad’s success.
    Vanity Metric #2: View-Through Conversions
    View-through conversion (VTC) is a metric that measures how often people who see your ad end up taking an desired action, such as making a purchase or signing up for a newsletter. VTC is often seen as a more reliable metric than CTR because it captures actual conversions rather than just clicks. However, VTC can also be inflated by publishers who use low-quality traffic sources or engage in other forms of fraud. As a result, VTC should not be used as the sole indicator of an ad’s success. This is highly useful, but often I wonder if it’s just another form of cookie stuffing.

    So what can be done? We believe that the industry must take a step back and reevaluate how it approaches programmatic. There are many ways to make the buying process more transparent and efficient for both buyers and sellers. This will require cooperation from all stakeholders, but we believe it is possible. What do you think? Is there anything you’d like to add? Let us know in the comments below!

Five Myths About CTV Advertising

0

Traditional TV advertising is becoming increasingly expensive, and many companies are struggling to justify the cost. CTV advertising offers a more budget-friendly alternative that can still provide significant exposure. While the CTV market is growing, it remains relatively untapped, providing opportunities for early adopters. In addition, CTV allows you to target specific demographics more effectively than traditional TV. As a result, it is an excellent option for companies looking to get the most bang for their advertising buck.

CTV and over-the-top (OTT) are not the same thing, though they are often referred to as synonymous. CTV is a television or internet-connected device that enables viewers to access content through applications, some of which may come preinstalled on a TV. Unlike linear TV, CTV includes smart TVs, streaming devices like Roku, TiVo, and Apple TV, as well as gaming consoles like PlayStation and Xbox. OTT refers to the delivery of content via the internet without the need for a traditional cable or satellite subscription.

 This means that viewers can watch OTT content on any internet-connected device, including laptops, smartphones, and tablets. While CTV and OTT are both growing in popularity, there are some key differences between the two. For one, CTV is typically viewed on a larger screen than OTT content. Additionally, CTV offers a more immersive viewing experience with access to features like pause, rewind, and fast-forward.

CTV Is Fraud Free. Unfortunately, however, that is not the case and in fact, CTV is a target for fraud. It is particularly attractive to fraudsters as a result of high CPMs (cost per thousand impressions or ‘mile’). In addition, CTV demand outstrips supply and advertisers are flocking to buy programmatically, which introduces new risks not present in direct buys.

Within the last year there have been numerous cases of fraudsters creating lookalike domains to popular streaming apps like HULU, ESPN and others in order to dupe ad tech platforms into thinking they are real. Once an ad tech platform has been tricked into thinking a domain is real, the fraudster can then fill it with all sorts of bogus content and serve up ads against it to generate revenue. This type of fraud is known as ‘domain spoofing’ and it is one of the most common types of CTV ad fraud. 

Fraudsters are also resorting to more sophisticated techniques like ‘pixel stuffing’ wherein they insert hidden pixels into video streams that go undetected by humans but can be counted by ad tech platforms as viewable impressions. These fraudulent impressions can then be sold programmatically at a premium to unsuspecting advertisers.

CTV uses Server-Side Ad Insertion (SSAI), which stitches the ad within the content being streamed, giving viewers a seamless viewing experience (read: no buffering). However, it makes it increasingly more difficult to detect fraud. For example, if an ad is inserted into a stream that is then viewed by a bot, the advertiser will be charged for the view even though the user never saw the ad.

All CTV Inventory is the Same. When it comes to online advertising, there’s a lot of talk about inventory. In the simplest terms, inventory is just the space on a website where ads can be placed. And programmatic inventory is inventory that’s bought and sold using automated processes. Currently, most programmatic inventory is bought through private marketplace deals directly with publishers. This is done in order to avoid running into inventory that’s likely to be fraudulent. But that means that the leftover inventory that’s bought programmatically through the Open Exchange is perceived to be lower in quality because it has a higher risk for fraud.

However, TV networks and streaming-only sellers like Amazon, Roku and streaming pay-TV provider FuboTV make their top-shelf CTV inventory available for programmatic purchase. Usually, this takes the form of programmatic guaranteed (PG) and private marketplace (PMP) deals so sellers can maintain some scarcity and not open themselves up to the lowest bidder in the programmatic open. And that’s good news for both buyers and sellers of TV advertising. By making their inventory available for programmatic purchase, TV networks and streaming providers are opening up a whole new world of opportunities for themselves. Not only can they sell more advertising inventory, but they can also do so at higher prices. And that’s good news for everyone involved in the TV ecosystem.

CTV Audiences are the Same: When I hear someone say that they don’t want to advertise on CTV because “it’s only for millennials” I can’t help but laugh. Because nearly every new TV is a smart TV and most of them require an internet connection the second you turn them on- something even the non-techie person can likely accomplish. Most of the CTV options are built right in. So when someone says that advertising on CTV wouldn’t reach their target market- I say they’re wrong. Plain and simple. CTV is for everyone. And that’s why it’s such an effective way to reach your target market, no matter who they are.


According to MediaPost, “among U.S. CTV consumers, the median age is 45.” In other words, CTV isn’t just for young people – it’s for anyone who wants to enjoy the advantages of streaming television. A recent article from eMarketer’s Insider Intelligence shows that four in 10 US seniors are also CTV users. That’s right: your grandparents are probably watching more CTV than you are. 

So why are seniors so into CTV? Well, there are a few reasons. First of all, CTV is incredibly convenient. Seniors can watch their favorite shows without having to leave the comfort of their homes. Additionally, CTV is much cheaper than traditional cable TV, which is ideal for budget-conscious seniors. Finally, CTV provides a level of flexibility that older adults appreciate. They can watch what they want, when they want, and they don’t have to deal with commercials.

CTV Is Super Expensive When it comes to connected TV (CTV), many advertisers believe that it is an expensive platform compared to other options like digital or traditional television. However, our findings show that CTV has one of the highest completion rates out there.

In fact, according to a study by Advertiser Perceptions, CTV had a 95% completion rate in Q2 2018, compared to just 66% for desktop and 72% for mobile. And when you compare CTV’s cost-per-thousand impressions (CPM) to other digital platforms, CTV is actually cheaper on average.

So why is CTV so successful? There are several reasons. First, viewers are more engaged with CTV ads than with other forms of advertising. In fact, according to Nielsen, people are 11% more likely to remember an ad they saw on CTV than on traditional television.

Second, CTV offers a more immersive experience than other digital platforms. With no banner ads or pop-ups, viewers are less likely to be distracted from the ad they’re watching. And finally, because CTV viewership is growing rapidly, brands have an opportunity to reach a large and engaged audience at a relatively low cost.

So if your KPI is the headline CPM, then it could be deemed expensive, but studies show that connected TV has one of the highest completion rates out there. So don’t be afraid to invest in this growing platform – it could be the key to reaching your target audience.

While it is clear that CTV advertising still has a lot of room to grow, we should not buy into the fake news about it and ignore the myths. There is a lot of good reason to advertise on CTV – from its growing viewership numbers to its ad capabilities. What do you think? Are you convinced that now is the time to start advertising on CTV? Let us know in the comments on LinkedIn

Five Reasons Conversational Marketing is Rocking

0

As more and more companies move towards automated customer service, it’s important to remember the importance of conversation marketing. This term is used for all of the interactions made one-on-one between customers and the company in real-time. This type of marketing is pretty straightforward as it requires a direct connection between the consumer and the company that is seldom made through various channels.

For years, we’ve stopped listening to our customers. Instead of speaking with them about their problems, we’ve been talking at them. This approach to marketing no longer works today as preferences are changing faster than ever. We need to start listening to our customers again if we want to stay ahead of the curve. We need to understand their needs and wants, and we need to be able to speak to them in a way that resonates. Only then will we be able to win their business – and their loyalty.

• Seventy-one percent of customers expect businesses to deliver personalized interactions, and 76% become frustrated when this doesn’t happen, according to McKinsey.
• Companies that excel at personalization generate 40% more revenue from those activities than average.
• Conversational marketing helps 50.7% of companies respond more quickly.
• Nearly eight in 10 businesses say they’ve experienced positive growth in sales, revenue, and customer loyalty as a result of live chat services.


The beauty of conversational marketing is that it allows for a personal touch that can often be lacking in automated customer service. As a result, this type of marketing can be a powerful tool for building relationships with customers and creating loyalty.

If you’re like most people, you probably think that conversational marketing and inbound marketing are the same thing. But the truth is, they’re actually quite different.

Inbound marketing is all about attracting your target audience through channels they already enjoy, such as social media or blog posts. On the other hand, conversational marketing is the process of engaging potential customers in real-time conversations, usually through live chat.

Marketing is all about creating relationships with your customers. And what better way to create a relationship than through conversation?

You can use various tools to facilitate conversational marketing, including chatbots, live chat, messaging apps, email and voice searches. Chatbots are great for automating personalized conversations, while live chat allows you to have real-time interactions with your customers. Messaging apps are perfect for sending one-to-one messages, and email is still a powerful tool for building relationships. Voice search is becoming increasingly popular, and it’s a great way to connect with your customers on a personal level. So whatever tools you use, make sure you’re creating opportunities for personalized conversations with your customers.

So what makes conversational marketing so effective?

1) Believe it or not, there was a time when people had to communicate with businesses during business hours. If you wanted to talk to a company about your product, you had to wait until they were open. But thanks to chatbot technology, that’s no longer the case. Chatbots allow customers to communicate with businesses on their own schedule, without having to wait for business hours. That’s pretty convenient, and it’s one of the reasons why chatbot technology is so important. In addition to being available when your customers are, chatbots also make it easy for customers to get the information they need. With just a few clicks, they can get answers to their questions and resolve their issues. And because chatbots are automated, they can provide those answers 24/7. That’s why chatbot technology is so important – it allows businesses to be there for their customers when they need them the most.

2) It’s awesome for nurturing leads. For too long, chatbots have been relegated to the dusty corners of the internet, used only for customer service and troubleshooting. But it’s time to give them a second chance! Chat are perfect for providing relevant content to help nurture leads down your marketing funnel. For example, if a contact has downloaded a top-of-the-funnel offer, the chatbot can suggest middle-of-the-funnel content to complement it and help move the lead further down the funnel. Chatbots are also great for quickly delivering timely content such as blog posts, infographics, ebooks, and more. So if you’re looking for a new way to deliver content to your leads and customers, don’t sleep on chatbots – they might just be the perfect solution.

Inbound marketing is all about giving users the ability to segment themselves. And what better way to do that than with a chatbot? Chatbots allow users to self-select where they are in the buyer’s journey, which provides the chatbot with the context it needs to offer relevant content. Giving users the ability to segment themselves in this way puts them in control of their journey, making conversational marketing inherently inbound. But that’s not all! Chatbots also have the ability tooffer personalized content, based on the user’s individual needs. This makes conversational marketing even more effective, as it ensures that users always receive relevant and useful information.

3. Best Way to Help with Cart Abandonment. There’s nothing worse than an abandoned cart. You’ve worked so hard to get a customer interested in your product, and then they just walk away without completing the purchase. It’s frustrating, but there is a way to reduce abandoned carts. A conversational approach is perhaps the single smartest way to turn a dumped cart into a fully-converted one. Instead of giving customers canned, one-way messages, you’re giving them a chance to voice their concerns. Plus your brand gets the chance to respond in real-time and get the result you want.

Sure, it takes a little more effort than setting up an automated email campaign (which also is a good idea). But it’s worth it when you consider the potential payoff. So next time you’re looking to boost your conversion rate, think about having a conversation with your customers instead of talking at them. It just might be the key to success.

4. When it comes to upselling and cross-selling, conversational marketing is the key to success. Through conversational marketing, you can better understand your customers and what they’re interested in. This understanding allows you to present them with more of your offerings at a time, and in a way that makes sense to them. Conversation data also enriches your understanding of the customer, providing opportunities for targeted marketing at a later date. With this data, you can identify when a customer is most likely to be interested in a particular product or service, and market to them accordingly. Overall, conversational marketing is an essential tool for upselling and cross-selling. By using it effectively, you can increase your sales and grow your business.

5. The human touch is one of the most important aspects of marketing. It establishes a connection with the customer and makes them feel valued. Conversational marketing provides this human touch by using artificial intelligence (AI) to create personal interactions with customers.

This means that customers can get help when they need it, and they can feel like they’re being greeted by a real person. This personal connection is what sets conversational marketing apart from other forms of marketing.

It’s important to note that not all conversational marketing is done through AI. Human interaction is still an important part of the process, and it’s something that can’t be replaced by AI. However, AI can be used to enhance human interaction, making it more personal and valuable for the customer.

It’s clear that conversational marketing is on the rise, and for good reason. Focusing on building conversations with customers is a sound strategy because it works. What do you think? Is your business using conversational marketing to its fullest potential? If not, consider making the switch – you may be surprised at how well it performs.

What Are Outstream Video Ads?

0

There’s no doubt that online video is booming. By 2019, it’s expected to generate 15.4 billion in spend and hog 80% of all internet traffic. The reason, Eric Wheeler says in a blog post for ClickZ, is video’s ability to “cut through the clutter and engage target audiences.”

And as we know, engagement is key when it comes to advertising. Outstream ads, which are videos that play in a separate window outside of the main content area, are one of the most effective ways to achieve it.

Outstream ads are the new kids on the block. These are videos that appear in non-video environments – mainly text-based content, like articles. They are videos or images that are placed outside of the traditional online media spaces, such as websites and social media platforms. Outstream ads are generally used to reach consumers on mobile devices, as they are more likely to be engaged with video content in that environment.

Despite the fact that they’re a newer advertising medium, outstream ads have quickly become one of the most popular and effective ways to reach consumers. In fact, according to a study by Mixpo, outstream videos drove an average click-through rate (CTR) of 0.35%, compared to 0.15% for traditional display ads.

That’s because outstream videos are a great way to capture attention and create a more engaging experience for users. They can help break up long blocks of text and add some visual interest, which can make it more likely that people will stick around and read the article they’re embedded in.

Outstream ads are a great way to get your videos in front of more people, and they can also be used to target people who might not have seen your videos before. Outstream ads are shown in places where people wouldn’t normally expect to see ads, such as on websites, in apps, and in social media feeds. Outstream ads can also be used to retarget people who have already seen your instream ads.

Outstream ads are video or display ads that appear on web pages outside of video players. Because outstream ads don’t interrupt or compete with the video content, they offer a less intrusive ad experience for users. Outstream ads also provide an opportunity for brands to reach engaged viewers with high-quality video content.

According to Google, Outstream ads are typically “silent” videos that play before, after, or during other videos on websites or social media platforms. One of the most common examples of outstream advertising is the “autoplay” video ad that Facebook users often see as they scroll through their newsfeed. These ads begin playing automatically without sound, and many people simply scroll right past them without paying much attention.

Outstream ads are a form of advertising that doesn’t interrupt or impose on the user’s experience. They slot into the places usually reserved for banner ads, and users can simply scroll past if they aren’t interested. If they are interested, then they make the choice to watch. They even decide whether they want to listen to the audio or not. This makes for a more positive customer experience and also means your video views aren’t wasted.

One popular way to use them is as interstitials.Interstitials are videos that play before or after another video. They are often used to promote a product or service, and they can be very effective at getting attention. In fact, a recent study by AOL found that outstream video ads drove a 2x increase in purchase intent compared to traditional display ads.

Another common way to use outstream ads is as native videos. Native videos are videos that are embedded in the content of a website or social media platform. They look like regular content, but they have an ad embedded in them. This can be a great way to get people’s attention without interrupting their experience.

Finally, outstream ads can also be used as in-feed videos. In-feed videos are videos that are placed in the regular flow of content on a website or social media platform. They typically play automatically, which can be a great way to get people’s attention.

Paul Muret, Google’s Director of Display and Video Advertising, spoke about the importance of integrating ads into content at the DoubleClick Leadership Summit in July. If ads do not integrate well it can lead to ad blindness, or worse annoyance, and ad blocking. But with outstream video ads, you can publish video ads in all kinds of content, like editorial pieces for example. You can also publish them natively, which works toward solving the problem of ad blindness.

Outstream video ads are a great way to produce results for your brand. They provide an immersive experience that engages the viewer and can lead to better conversions than other ad units. What’s more, outstream ads are only going to become more popular as time goes on, so it’s important to get ahead of the curve now. Have you tried using outstream video ads in your marketing? If not, what’s stopping you?

Tips for Sellers of Coaching Services and Work-at-Home Opportunities

0

            Providers beware.

            The Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general continue to aggressive investigate and enforce legal regulations relating to offers for business coaching services and work-at-home opportunities.

            Without a doubt, there are various red flags that will almost always draw the attention of regulatory agencies.  For example:

  • Express or implied representations about guaranteed income
  • Express or implied representations about large returns
  • Express or implied representations about a “proven system”
  • Express or implied representations about depositing checks
  • Statements about being your boss
  • Statements about learning from experts, coaches or mentors
  • Misleading consumers about the experience of “coaches,” “experts” or “mentors,” and/or misleading consumers about them when they are really just commissioned salespeople
  • Statements about making money with little time, effort or experience
  • Statements concerning recruiting more people to make big money
  • Claims that a detailed understanding of the business is not required
  • Free or low-cost “systems” to get a business started that eventually turn into significant expenditures
  • Promises that are not delivered upon
  • Tiered memberships with different service levels and price points
  • Failing to make material disclosures, up-front, such as costs and/or that buyers will have to work a lot of hours without pay 
  • Informing consumers, after they pay, that in order to succeed they will have to pay more for additional services

            Leading consumers to believe that they will be provided with useful, valuable and/or proprietary business information to help them earn money that is – in reality – freely available online can also land promoters in hot water.  

            If a significant number of consumers that have enrolled in such programs have not, in fact, achieved a functional online business or earned revenue (winding up in debt), state and/or federal regulators may be very interested.

            Also, beware of the Business Opportunity Rule

            The FTC’s Business Opportunity Rule requires those that offer commercial arrangements where a seller solicits a prospective buyer to enter into a new business, the prospective purchaser makes a required payment, and the seller – expressly or by implication – makes certain kinds of claims.  For example, opportunities where a seller says it will help the buyer set up or run the business.

            Also, various states have their own legal regulations that govern coaching services and work-at-home business opportunities.  Always disclose the total cost of a work-at-home program, including supplies, equipment and membership fees.  Never disregard the assessment of whether various state laws may apply because they may have their own requirements, such as registration and disclosures.

            Consult an FTC CID lawyer in order to determine if the Business Opportunity Rule applies to the offer that you are promoting.  If the offer does, in fact, fall within the BOR, the buyer must be provided with a Disclosure Document within seven days of a buyer signing a contract or pays any money for the business opportunity.

            The Disclosure Document is a standard form, and must provide the company name, business address, phone number, the sales person’s name and the date the document was provided to the prospective buyer.  The Disclosure Document must also disclose whether the  company or certain key personnel have been the subject of civil or criminal actions involving misrepresentation, fraud, violation of the securities laws, or any unfair or deceptive practices – including violation of any FTC rule – within the past ten years.  If the answer is yes, the seller must attach a list of the actions to the Disclosure Document.

            The Disclosure Document must also address any cancellation or refund policy.  If the seller has a cancellation or refund policy, a description must be attached to the Disclosure Document.

            The seller is also required to provide contact information for at least ten people that have purchased a business opportunity from the seller.  If more than ten people have purchased a business opportunity, the seller may list the ten that live closest to the prospective buyer.  If fewer than ten people have purchased one, the seller must list everyone.  The seller must update the list every month, until ten people have purchased. 

            The Disclosure Document must also say clearly and conspicuously: “If you buy a business opportunity from the seller, your contact information can be disclosed in the future to other buyers.”  The prospective buyer has to sign, date and return the Disclosure Document to the  seller, and the seller must ensure that it has attached any other documents required by the Business Opportunity Rule.  The Disclosure Document must be updated quarterly and if a business opportunity is marketed in a language other than English, the Disclosure Document – along with the required disclosures – must be in that language.

            Beware of earnings claims.

            If a seller makes express or implied claims about how much money a person can earn from a business opportunity, the seller is required to put the claim(s) in writing.  It is unlawful to make earnings claims unless there exists reasonable evidence that substantiate such representations.  The  seller is required to make such materials available to a prospective buyer or to the FTC if they are requested.

            Importantly, if a seller makes an express or implied earnings claim, it must provide the prospective a separate document that clearly says across the top EARNINGS CLAIM STATEMENT REQUIRED BY LAW.  The Earnings Claim Statement must set forth who is making the claim and the date, the specifics of the claim, the start and end date the purported earnings were achieved, the number and percentage of buyers that got at least that result, any information about the buyers that got those results that might vary from prospective buyers (e.g., where they are located) and a statement that prospective buyers can get written proof for the earnings claims if requested.

            Additionally, for earnings claims made online, on TV, in newspapers or in other media, the seller must possess written proof on hand that supports the representations and has to disclose certain information when the claim is made.  For example, the start and end date the earnings were achieved and the number and percentage of purchasers that obtained at least that result. 

            General statements about earnings or statistics must be capable of being appropriately substantiated.  Also, if information previously provided by a seller to a prospective buyer in the Earnings Claim Statement substantively changes, the seller is obligated to let the prospective buyer know what those changes are, in writing, before the prospective buyer signs a contract or pays any money.  Like the Disclosure Document, if a seller promotes a business opportunity in a language other than English, the Earnings Claim Statement has to be in that language, too.

            If a prospective buyer is told something in person, in an email, over the phone, or in any other advertisement or promotion, the seller should ensure that the foregoing do not contradict what is stated in written disclosures, including the Disclosure Document and the Earnings Claim Statement.

            The Business Opportunity Rule also requires a seller to keep certain records and make them available to the FTC for three years.  For example and without limitation, each buyer’s signed disclosure receipt, all executed written contracts and substantiation supporting earnings claims.

            Earnings claims are a regulatory favorite.  Beware of testimonials as they can easily constitute unsubstantiated express or implied representations.  An experienced FTC compliance lawyer can assist promoters of coaching services and work-at-home opportunities with ensuring that the use of testimonials do not violate applicable legal regulations.

            It is unlawful to deceive people expressly or by implication.  And, even if what a business opportunity seller says something that is literally truthful, it still could be deceptive in context.  For example, a claim can be misleading if relevant information is omitted or if the claim implies something that is not true.  

            Beware of the Telemarketing Sales Rule

            Regulatory agencies have demonstrated that they will also aggressively pursue violations of the Telemarketing Sale Rule.  Note that TSR violations come with significant monetary penalties.

Takeaway:  The Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general have been extremely aggressive when it comes to marketers that offer business coaching and work-at-home programs.   Particularly, those that promise a great living by working from home, with little effort.  Consult an experienced FTC CID attorney to ensure compliance with applicable federal and state legal regulations.

Richard B. Newman is an FTC CID lawyer at Hinch Newman LLP.

Attorney advertising. Informational purposes only. Not legal advice.

What is Intrinsic In-Game Advertising?

0

Intrinsic in-game advertising is a type of advertising that is placed within the game itself. This means that the ads are seamlessly integrated into the game environment and do not interrupt the player’s gaming experience. Instead, they feel natural to the experience. Intrinsic in-game advertising is a growing trend in the advertising industry, as it offers a more seamless and unobtrusive experience for players.

There are a number of benefits to using intrinsic in-game advertising. For starters, it allows brands to reach a highly engaged audience. In fact, gamers are known to be one of the most engaged and attentive audiences around. They are also more likely to remember messages that are placed within the game environment. Intrinsic in-game advertising also allows brands to create a more immersive experience for players, which can lead to better engagement and recall. Additionally, intrinsic in-game advertising is a great way to build awareness for new products or services.

Overall, intrinsic in-game advertising is a great way to reach an engaged and attentive audience while creating a more immersive experience for players. If you’re looking to reach gamers with your brand’s message, then intrinsic in-game advertising is definitely worth considering.

One of the main concerns about in-game advertising is that it could negatively affect game play. Some people argue that ads can be distracting or disruptive. Others worry that they could influence players to make choices based on what they’ve seen in an ad, rather than what they think is best for them.

Despite these concerns, in-game advertising is becoming increasingly popular. This is in part because it offers a unique opportunity to reach gamers who are otherwise difficult to reach. Gamers are an attractive target market because they are young, engaged, and have high disposable incomes.

In-game advertising has also been shown to be effective. A study by IAB found that in-game ads result in a higher brand recall than traditional forms of advertising such as TV and print ads. They also found that gamers are more likely to buy products that they’ve seen advertised in a game than products that have been advertised on TV.

By definition, intrinsic in-game advertising is a form of advertising that is embedded within the game content itself. Standardization offers huge benefits to the gaming and esports industries because it provides a stronger understanding of the value we get from these types of investments. Historically, showing our ROI has been difficult for in-game activations because we knew that is where our core consumers were showing up but we didn’t have the metrics to back it up. But with standardized metrics in place, we are now able to understand things like how long users are spending in-game and how engaged they are with the advertising content. This allows us to better assess what works well and continue allocating resources towards those activations that provide the most value for our brands.

Netflix’s Advertising Plan is Too Expensive and It Sucks

0

Netflix ad prices could be too expensive for some companies at $65 cost per thousand, according to a Wednesday report from The Wall Street Journal.

WSJ received this information from ad buyers who met with Netflix and its ad partner Microsoft last week. The price is higher than what streaming platforms typically charge advertisers, said the buyers.  Some industry experts believe that the high price could limit Netflix’s ability to attract new advertisers.  Others say that the price is justified because Netflix has a large and engaged audience.

Netflix is looking to increase its revenue after posting a quarterly loss of $133 million in April. The company has been investing more in original programming, which has led to increased costs.

Advertisers may be hesitant to pay the high price for Netflix ads, especially as viewership for the platform declines. Research company Moffett Nathanson found that Netflix lost about 2 million subscribers in the United States last year.

Netflix is charging too much for its ads, and media buyers won’t be able to get verified measurement from third-party sources like Nielsen and Comscore, according to a report from AdAge. Wait, what? So you’ll be paying a premium price and no way to validate the numbers?

There are a few reasons why no third party measurement is a bad idea for Netflix ad sales. First, it makes it difficult to judge the effectiveness of Netflix’s ads. Without outside measurement, Netflix can’t compare how its ads perform against those of other streaming providers or traditional TV networks. This means that Netflix may be wasting money on ads that aren’t effective, and it can’t learn from its mistakes to improve its advertising strategy.

Second, it makes it difficult for Netflix to compete for ad dollars. Traditional TV networks and other streaming providers can point to independent measurements to show that their ads are effective. Netflix can’t do this, which makes it less attractive to potential advertisers.

Ultimately, no third party measurement is bad for Netflix because it makes it difficult to judge the effectiveness of its ads, makes it less competitive for ad dollars, and gives it an unfair advantage over its competitors.

At those prices, Netflix may not be able to convince advertisers to buy in, especially without any verification of the accuracy of their measurements. The company has been investing heavily in original programming and has been ramping up its advertising efforts, but it may be tough to sell ad space at those prices.

Because Netflix is so new to advertising, there is very little targeting capabilities in the sense that most marketers interpret the term. Also, most of the commercials will run in proximity to shows of Netflix’s choosing with buyers having no say about what program content their ads are placed next to.

This can be a major issue for brands that are looking to specifically target a certain demographic with their advertising. And, even if brands are lucky enough to get their commercials placed next to appropriate program content, they may find that the real “premium content” on Netflix – shows like House of Cards or Narcos – excludes ads altogether

Netflix has responded to these criticisms by saying that they are still in the early stages of development for their advertising platform, and that they are working hard to improve it. They have also promised more sophisticated targeting capabilities in the future. But for now, advertisers should be wary about spending money on Netflix advertising. There are simply too many unknowns and potential problems.

WTF Are UTM Codes?

0

UTM codes are snippets of code that are attached to the end of a URL. UTM codes are also used to pinpoint specific sources of traffic to a website. At minimum, UTM codes include a traffic source, medium, and campaign name. UTMs can be used to track email campaigns, paid ads, social media posts, and more.

To create a UTM code, you’ll need three pieces of information: the traffic source, medium, and campaign name. You can track any of these three pieces of information separately or together. The most common way to use UTMs is to track traffic sources and mediums together. For example, if you’re running a Facebook ad campaign, you would track the traffic source as Facebook and the medium as paid advertising.

Here’s an example of a UTM code:
https://www.example.com/page?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=paid_advertising

The code above would tell you that the traffic for that page came from Facebook and was generated through paid advertising. You can also use UTMs to track clicks on specific links. For example, if you have a landing page that you want to track specifically, you can add a UTM code to the link that points to the landing page. This will help you gauge how successful your landing page is at converting visitors into leads or customers.

To create a UTM code for a link, use this format:
https://www.example.com/page?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=paid_advertising&utm_campaign=landing_page

The code above would tell you that the traffic for that page came from Facebook, was generated through paid advertising, and was for your landing page campaign.

To create a UTM code, you’ll need to use a URL builder. This is a free online tool that makes it easy to create UTM codes. You’ll need to input the following information into the URL builder:

-The website’s URL
-The campaign name
-The source
-The medium
-The content
-The term

treaming Video Advertising’s Dirty Secret

0

The data is in: streaming has finally overtaken cable as the most popular source of television content in the U.S.

Nielsen’s latest Total Audience report shows that, as of July, 34.8% of all TV content consumed by Americans came from streaming services like Netflix and Disney+, while only 34.4% came from cable providers like HBO.

This is a major shift from just a few years ago, when cable was still the dominant source of television content. But traditional TV, which includes broadcast and cable, still accounts for a majority of television viewing.

But as the industry has grown, so has the incidence of advertising fraud.

According to a report by Method Media Intelligence, a digital ad measurement firm, one group of bad actors has been able to scam as much as $10 million a month from ad budgets that were supposed to go toward connected TV, or CTV, like streaming platforms.

However, that’s not Video Advertising Dirty Secret.

The Dirty Secret is that this is easy to solve, but very little is being done about it in order to generate enormous (fraudulent) revenue

Method Media Intelligence estimates that as much as 50% of programmatic requests in CTV are counterfeit. 

One of the ways fraudsters are scamming ad buyers is by making fake CTV ad calls using mobile apps like Grindr. Where they had previously manufactured fake display ads and video ads, criminals are now manufacturing fake CTV ad impressions, simply by calling it CTV ad impressions instead of display and video ads, in order to get 10X higher CPMs.

One of the CTV scams “involved 28.8 million household IP addresses, spoofed about 3,600 app installs, and generated 5.8 billion fake video views.” This scam was able to generate over $200,000 in fraudulent revenue.

Another recent example of streaming advertising fraud involved a scheme that used a botnet to generate millions of bogus views for a cryptocurrency-related video. The video was viewed over 200 million times, resulting in over $80,000 in fraudulent revenue.

So why is there so much fraud in CTV? There are a few reasons:

First, because CTV is still a relatively new medium, there is a lot of confusion about how it works and how to best exploit its potential. This confusion creates opportunities for fraudsters who can take advantage of the lack of knowledge and trust among players in the ecosystem.

Second, CTV offers many opportunities for dishonest actors to game the system. For example, because CTV ads are often sold on an impression basis, fraudsters can easily generate fake views by using bots or other automated means. Additionally, because CTV ads are often delivered through ad networks or exchanges, it is easy for fraudsters to spoof legitimate traffic or inject fake ads into the system.

Finally, CTV has been slower to adopt anti-fraud measures than other digital channels such as desktop and mobile web. They are looking for quick bucks and know that if they cut off as much of 50% of their revenue because of fraud, they won’t look so good to investors

So, what can be done, and what methods could easily help solve the fraud problem in Streaming?

When viewers power down their TV without quitting the CTV app, this can cause programming – including ads – to run while the viewer isn’t actively using the device. This can lead to ad fraud, as advertisers lose out on potential impressions and clicks.

But a new study from DoubleVerify shows that ad fraud is 83% less likely to occur when advertisers tailor their campaigns for “fully on-screen” CTV environments. The study looked at three different types of fraud: invalid traffic (IVT), non-human traffic (NHT), and domain spoofing.

For the study, DoubleVerify used data from over 2.5 billion video ad impressions across both desktop and CTV platforms. They found that the incidence of invalid traffic was 3% on desktop, compared to just 0.5% on CTV. And for non-human traffic, the incidence was 5% on desktop and 1.1% on CTV.

Another simple way to prevent fraud is brought to us by fraud researcher Augustine Fou: While there are many ways to protect yourself from streaming fraud, the best way is to ensure that you are only streaming from legitimate sources.

 Legitimate sources are those that have been authorized by the copyright holder to stream their content. This can include major networks like ESPN, History Channel, and CBS, as well as other major providers like A&E and HGTV. These aren’t things like the “ESPN Exchange” which isn’t on ESPN.


It’s obvious that something could be done, but many companies just aren’t interested in taking the appropriate steps to ensure fraud isn’t on their properties. Companies like Roku know that screensavers and other questionable programs are creating fake ads on their platform, and they are just ignoring it for the fraudulent revenue. This raises some questions that if they know this, what is their liability both criminally and civilly? What do you think should be done to help prevent fraud and expose these scams?

Q&A with Tom Bowman, Non-Executive Director, multilocal

0

Tom Bowman has worked at media owners, agency side, and in ad tech; having held a number of global roles at organisations such as Microsoft and BBC Worldwide. Bowman has over a decade of experience advising UK start-ups and scale-ups and boasts a strong track record of building international sales networks.

For me, it’s always about the people. Having worked in this industry for many years and experienced organisations with effective leadership teams you can learn from and respect, I know what a strong team looks like. The multilocal team is very talented, with a high level of integrity, humility and transparency and an attitude to provide excellent service. These are all qualities that appeal to me. 

Naturally, the business idea must also be sound. When the service offering was explained to me around helping advertisers unlock their audiences, get their campaign spend away and deliver results, it immediately made sense. Having worked in operations and strategy for many companies, including the BBC, I’ve seen how fractured and fragmented digital is, and many marketers are crying out for support here.

In what way is digital fragmented?

Well, the perception of programmatic is of a highly automated approach, delivering efficiencies and speeding up processes. This is inaccurate. While some aspects are automated, such as bidding, other areas still rely on manual intervention, which can make it incredibly complex.

At the BBC, where we sold TV and digital together, I found digital was where the complications and delays occurred when we were trying to deliver integrated multichannel campaigns for brands. And it’s still true today.  

One example is video. Senior advertising executives have confided that commitments to clients for digital video turnaround times significantly lag behind TV.  We’re talking weeks rather than days in some cases! There is a significant opportunity for professional campaign management, and that’s why new solutions are needed. 

So what’s the solution to this?

It’s about focusing on what’s important to advertisers. When you talk to marketers, they want to find the right audience, optimise their messaging and hit their campaign objectives. That’s it. They don’t obsess over technologies, supply chains or the myriad other issues that an inward-looking ad tech industry concerns itself with. To them, it’s just background noise.

Ultimately it comes down to simplifying things and making it easy for brands and agencies to unlock campaign success. 

multilocal is about helping buyers curate audiences. What does this mean? 

It’s about finding, organising and supplying the right audience to an advertiser and then optimising it to achieve their campaign goals. We’re reducing the friction for brands in getting their advertising in front of relevant audiences in the right environments. 

But we’ve got the flexibility to work with businesses across the supply chain. This can be enabling publishers to use their inventory more efficiently, helping traders get their campaigns away or ensuring advertisers find the right audiences and optimise them. We’re unlocking the potential of digital campaigns so they hit each advertiser’s unique objectives.  

Why is there a need for such a service today?

As I’ve said, programmatic has introduced complexity and friction into the buying and selling process, and as new technologies are constantly emerging, things get further complicated. For many businesses, gaining the skills or retaining the expertise needed to keep up to date with this fluid environment is impossible. While some are set up for it, many struggle and need support.

The past two-and-a-half years have seen online become even more central to people’s lives, and digital advertising has never been more important. Getting the fundamentals right is becoming a critical success factor in ensuring it’s efficient and effective. This makes it essential for companies to work with people who understand the industry and technology and can get their campaigns away.      

How are you supporting the development of multilocal?

As a non-exec director, I’m here to advise and guide the board, so the business has the capabilities and resources to grow successfully. 

I don’t have a magic wand. But what I do have is my experiences of being around successful and unsuccessful businesses, both large and small, and being part of the advertising and digital industry for so long. I can offer up guidance based on what I’ve seen work and not work and provide opinions on approaches to take.  

And as it’s easy for fast-growing companies to be distracted, I’m also helping keep the business focused on the right things, while ensuring opportunities with potential are properly assessed so they can be taken advantage of if they can benefit the business. 

How Scammy Are NFTS Really?

0

I remember when NFTs started, everyone said this would be the newest most amazing thing and that it would totally transform technology where everyone would be using them control transactions and prevent fraud, and would be more than just a fad for early adopters.

Of course since their inception in 2015, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have seen a rapid growth in both popularity and value. In 2022, Brand companies left and right have been releasing NFTs to “newsjack” and get their name in the news, even if no one actually buys the NFTs.

This has led to a corresponding growth in scams, as criminals attempt to take advantage of the enthusiasm around this new technology.

NFTs are digital assets that are unique and cannot be divided into smaller units. This makes them well-suited for use in virtual worlds and other online applications, as each asset can be easily identified and tracked. This is what we were told.

The first NFTs were based on the Ethereum blockchain, but there are now a number of different platforms that support them. These include EOS, NEO, Cardano, and TRON.

There have been several other prominent exit scams in the NFT industry. One recent example is the Prodeum scam. In this scam, the developers raised over $11 million by promising to create a revolutionary new way to track produce using blockchain technology.

However, after raising the money, they disappeared without a trace, taking all the investors’ money with them. They also shut down the website leaving only the word “penis.”

Other notable examples include Thingschain and Darcrus. In both scams, the developers raised large sums of money by promising to create innovative new platforms using blockchain technology. However, after taking the money from investors, they failed to deliver on their promises and disappeared with the funds.

Also many artists have criticized the practice, claiming that NFT creators have stolen their work for mass gain. Even Wikipedia got in on the act, refusing to acknowledge the practice as ‘art’ under its guidelines.

OpenSea, the NFT marketplace that valued itself at $13 billion after raising $300 million, claims that more than 80% of NFTs created for free on its platform were either plagiarized from other artists or spam. This literally means that it’s a black market by definition.

This is a major issue for OpenSea, as it devalues the NFTs that are legitimately created and traded on the platform. It’s also frustrating for users who spend time and money creating original content, only to see it copied and used without permission. This shows that despite the claim that NFTs would be used to prevent fraud and track real artwork, it was being used just for the opposite.

OpenSea says it’s been working on a solution to this problem, and is currently implementing new measures that will “more effectively prevent plagiarism and spam.” But it’s not clear yet what those measures will be, or how effective they will be – since most artists aren’t on OpenSea and can’t actively monitor if their artwork is being stolen.

These scams have caused many people to lose faith in NFTs as a whole. Many artists and developers have criticized NFTs for being nothing more than vehicles for fraud and theft. Even Wikipedia has refused to recognize NFTs as ‘art’ under its guidelines.

Worse, NFT art aren’t really NFTs. When purchasing NFT art right now, it’s really nothing more than directions on how to access or download an image. The image is not stored on the blockchain and the majority of are hosted on web 2.0 storage, which is likely to end up as a 404 in the near future, meaning the NFT has even less value than nothing. I bet you didn’t know this.

However, even though there is a rise of scams, this isn’t just about NFTs.

For any market in order for existing investors to profit, new buyers have to be drawn into the market. So too NFTs, with something illusory attached to the digital assets.

There’s virtually nothing humans can’t turn into a market. But increasingly there are speculative bubbles in things with absolutely no fundamental value. NFTs have joined Bitcoin and other digital currencies in this category in recent months.

However, not all NFTs are scams. There are many legitimate projects being developed using NFTs that are not involved in any form of fraud or theft. These projects are helping to legitimize NFTs as a whole and show that they can be used for legitimate purposes. Yet, they aren’t being promoted via message boards and groups trying to make a quick buck.

Blockchain technology is revolutionizing many industries, and the supply chain industry is no exception. One of the main functions of blockchain-based NFTs in supply chains is authentication. By tracking the movement of goods through the supply chain and recording it on the blockchain, businesses can ensure the quality and authenticity of their products.

In addition to authentication, another benefit of using NFTs in supply chains is transparency. All data on the blockchain is immutable and transparent, so businesses can track the origins of their products and verify that they have been processed according to regulations. This helps to build trust between businesses and consumers.

NFTs are still in the early stages of development, but they show great potential for use in logistics applications. For example, IBM has partnered with food giant Walmart to develop a blockchain-based system for tracing food items from farm to table. This system will use NFTs to track items such as meat and produce, ensuring that they are not contaminated and can be traced back if there is a problem.

Other companies are also looking into using NFTs for supply chain applications. For instance, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba has teamed up with logistics firm Cainiao Network to create a blockchain platform for tracking shipments. The platform will use NFTs to record information such as package tracking numbers, delivery times and temperatures. This will help ensure that goods are delivered on time and under the correct conditions.

As more businesses adopt blockchain technology, we can expect to see NFTs playing an increasingly important role in ensuring the quality and authenticity of products throughout the supply chain. Somehow to be taken seriously, there needs to be some sort of governance over NFTs and a way to ensure that the market isn’t all about scams and a quick buck.

Until this happens, NFTs will still be 80% scams.

Why the Trade Desk is Taking Over

0

People said that you couldn’t compete with Google. In the world of digital advertising, Google reigns supreme. The company has crushed almost all its competitors, thanks to its unmatched technological capabilities.

However, one rival is emerging as the best hope to challenge Google’s monopoly: The Trade Desk. The company has been growing rapidly in recent years, and it now dominates the field of programmatic advertising.

The company, which went public in 2016, helps advertisers buy ad space on different websites and mobile apps. It has been growing rapidly, reporting sales increases quarter after quarter. In a strong show of faith in the online-advertising industry, Trade Desk Inc. (TTD) reported stronger-than-expected sales and guidance Tuesday amid doubts about the space. It also reported sales of $392 million for the third quarter, beating the $385 million Wall Street was expecting.

Shares soared 15% in extended trading following the report.

Google has responded by slashing prices for some of its advertising products, but The Trade Desk’s CEO Jeff Green says that won’t slow his company down.

“We’re not worried about Google,” he said in an interview with Barron’s. “They’re a great company, but we’re focused on what we’re doing.”

The Trade Desk is also benefiting from the growth of streaming video and audio, which is driving up demand for digital advertising. The company says it expects sales to grow by another 50% this year.

So why is the Trade Desk “Kicking Ass?”

1)   People don’t like Google’s Monopoly: As the giant of online advertising, Google has long been the target of accusations of monopolistic practices. This week, those allegations seemed to gain fresh traction as Bloomberg reported that the Justice Department is preparing to sue the company.The news was seen as a positive for independent ad tech companies, with Jeff Green, CEO of The Trade Desk, telling Bloomberg that it’s “a good time to be an independent ad tech company.”Green added that the allegations against Google are “getting more and more attention in the public,” and that this is good for smaller players in the space. Frankly, he is right, the more they take on Google, the more gravitas and attention it gives the Trade Desk.

2)   It’s a Great Place to Work: The Trade Desk is a great place to work, according to the majority of employees who responded to a recent survey. 93% of respondents said that it was a great place to work, compared to just 57% at a typical U.S.-based company.This high level of satisfaction is likely due to a number of factors, including the company’s strong culture and its focus on employee happiness.The Trade Desk also offers a number of great benefits, including unlimited vacation days, free food and drinks, and flexible working arrangements. All of this contributes to a positive work environment that employees love – and it more important to a company’s success than many people realize.

3)   Transparency is the New Programmatic: Transparency has become an increasingly important issue in the media buying world, as advertisers have become frustrated with the lack of clarity and unfairness in a space that has long been dominated by a handful of platforms.However, there is one company that is emerging as a leader in transparency and fairness: The Trade Desk. The Trade Desk’s commitment to transparency is evident in everything they do. For example, they are the only company that discloses all of their fees up front. They also make all of their data available to clients so they can see where their money is being spent. And they are one of the few companies that allow clients to audit their programmatic campaigns. Then they launched, OpenPath which is seen as leveling the playing field for advertisers who are frustrated with systems that are riddled with fraud and transparency issues.

In an industry that is often shrouded in secrecy, The Trade Desk stands out as a beacon of transparency. Thanks to its commitment to openness and fairness, The Trade Desk is quickly becoming the go-to platform for media buyers who demand honesty and integrity in their advertising partners.

Also, let’s be honest: The Trade Desk is a promising company that could really take off if Google’s ad business is broken up. Google has been dominating the ad market for years, and it’s been tough for anyone else to compete. But if there’s some break up of Google, it will finally give whatever’s left to have an equal competitor. This puts the Trade Desk in a unique place, because they are situated already to compete with Google.

Why Would Comcast Buy Vizio?

0

If the reports are true, it would seem that Comcast is interested in acquiring Vizio, a U.S.-based smart TV company. This would be a significant move for the company, as it looks to augment its smart TV strategy.  

According to Protocol, Comcast spoke to Vizio last year, and again earlier in 2022. The report says that Comcast has also conducted M&A discussions with TP Vision, the Amsterdam-based manufacturer that markets smart TVs under the Philips brand. TP Vision also has a presence in North America, and this could be an attractive proposition for Comcast.  

This comes just after Comcast and Charter Communications announced a new joint venture that will see the two companies team up to create a new streaming distribution business. The new business will be based on Comcast’s current Flex platform and hardware business, and will include Comcast’s XClass TV retail operations. The new venture will help Comcast to expand its reach into the streaming market and provide it with a larger customer base for its XClass TV products.

It also provides Charter with an opportunity to enter the streaming market without having to build its own infrastructure.  When it comes to acquisitions, Comcast’s chairman and CEO Brian Roberts is very selective. In a recent interview, Roberts reiterated that the bar for acquisitions was “very high” for his team. This is understandable given Comcast’s size and scope. As any business owner knows, it is essential to continually reassess your company’s assets and determine whether they are still the right fit for your needs.

This can be especially challenging in today’s uncertain climate, but it is essential to maintain a competitive edge. Roberts and his team have been focused on this task, and he feels confident that they are making the right decisions for the company. They have returned capital to shareholders and maintained a strong focus on their core assets.

As a result, Roberts feels that his company is well-positioned to weather any storm. As more and more people cut the cord and move to streaming services, traditional cable TV providers are feeling the pressure to keep up.

One way they may be able to do this is by becoming a platform like Roku or Amazon Fire TV, offering thousands of streaming apps and services.  This would require deeper connections with smart TV manufacturers, however, in order to get the necessary software and hardware, and thus why they would want to buy Vizio.  

Interestingly enough,  Vizio is one of the top-ranked smart TV brands in the United States, but it has seen its market share erode in recent years with the rapid emergence of cheap Roku-powered TV’s made by China’s TCL. Vizio doesn’t actually make its own TVs, but rather imports them from independent factories in China, Vietnam and Mexico. While Vizio still offers a quality product, the competition from TCL has forced it to lower prices in order to stay competitive. As a result, Vizio’s margins have been squeezed and it has had to cut costs in other areas in order to keep up with TCL’s aggressive pricing. 


The company has also made a name for itself in the world of advanced advertising. Vizio’s TVOS platform enables the company to collect detailed data about its users’ viewing habits, which it then uses to deliver targeted ads. The result is a highly effective ad platform that helps Vizio generate significant revenue. 

Notably, Vizio’s advanced advertising business is one of the main reasons why the company was able to become profitable so quickly after going public. With its strong position in the market, Vizio looks poised to continue its success in the years to come even if it’s not bought by Comcast.

What do you think? Follow and Contribute to the Conversation on LinkedIn.

Data, Dance, and Daring Campaigns: Erin Levzow’s Approach to Building Loyalty

0
How Mango Habanero, Metrics, and Masterful Moves Redefined Marketing Genius Every so often, a guest comes along who doesn’t just raise the bar—they throw it into orbit. Erin Levzow is one of those guests. From the moment she joined The ADOTAT Show, it was clear we were in the presence of brilliance. Erin is a marketing powerhouse, blending emotional intelligence with razor-sharp strategy, all wrapped in a package of humor, humility, and dazzling storytelling. She’s the...

Streaming’s Big Lie: The Future of TV Is Already Broke

0
Streaming was supposed to be the savior of TV—the rebellious new kid with no commercials, endless content, and an open bar of binge-worthy dopamine hits. But, as Doug Shapiro’s sharp, no-BS research reveals, the revolution is out of cash and looking for a loan. Streaming doesn’t just monetize less—it barely monetizes at all. For every streaming dollar generated, old-school pay TV is making it rain with three dollars in subscriber fees and seven dollars...

How to Narrow the Scope of Information Sought by an FTC Civil Investigative Demand (CID)

0
A civil investigative demand (“CID”) is the instrument by which the Federal Trade Commission exercises its compulsory process authority in connection with investigations.  CIDs may require the production of documents - including electronically stored information – or tangible things, the provision of testimony, and the providing of written responses to questions. A CID must state the nature of the conduct constituting the alleged violation which is under investigation and the provision of law applicable to...

Did Your Company Receive a Letter From the FTC?  FTC Warning Letters and Notices of Penalty Offense

0
Recipients of FTC warning letters and notices of penalty offense should be on high alert and act quickly. Their advertising and marketing practices could be in violation of applicable legal regulations. What is an FTC Warning Letter? Federal Trade Commission “warning letters” are intended to warn companies that their conduct is likely unlawful and that they can face serious legal consequences, such as a federal investigation or lawsuit, if they do not immediately stop. ...

The Good, the Bad, and the SPO-ly

0
The Hidden Flaws Behind Ad Tech’s Favorite Buzzword. Supply Path Optimization (SPO) is my love-hate relationship in ad tech personified. It’s the reason I fell for this industry’s maddening brilliance—and why it sometimes feels like a bad rom-com where no one learns their lesson. At its core, SPO promises efficiency, transparency, and accountability, and when it works, it’s like watching a Rube Goldberg machine perform flawlessly. But when it doesn’t—and let’s be honest, that’s most...