Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Home Blog Page 1193

Official PMI Affiliate Summit East Party List

1

Honestly, I wanted to do a comprehensive list of the parties, but after looking what was going on, I realized that most of the events are just going to plain suck or be a total waste of time. There is honestly, only a few parties worth going to, and the rest will be a few guys too scared to attend the larger parties, sitting around at some cheap bar hoping to find an escort that doesn’t cost too much.

So here’s a small list of parties that you need to know about:

Adknowledge and CPA WAY Xposure NYC
9m until whatever works for you at LQ Club
RSVP Here: http://www.xposurelq.com

ClickBooth Empire Party with Juvenile
9pm until 2 am at the Hudson Rooftop Garden Club
RSVP Here: http://www.affiliatemarketingempireparty.com

EngageBDR Exclusive Party
9pm until Ted passes out drunk @ the Griffin NYC
RSVP Here: http://engagebdr.com/newsletters/affiliate-summit-east-2012/

So you’re asking me, why not mention affiliate ball? Because they are charging the attendees. Yes, despite getting people in the industry to pay for “sponsorships” for the event, when you show up, you are going to have to pay for drinks. The cost? As much as $20+ per drink, meaning that if you want 3-4 drinks during the night you may as well lay down $100 per person. I can’t imagine what they are thinking, because nothing in my opinion is so lame asking people to attend a party sponsored by companies int he industry, then actually require them to pay. It means its not really “sponsored” because you are paying and footing the bill. The idea of a sponsored party at a convention is that you get to attend for free, because the sponsors want your attention on their brands. Lame.

Twitter Has Tons of Fakes Too

3

A little over a week ago, the news of Facebook’s fake clicks shed a bit of light on their real situation, and after that the world learned that 10% of Facebook’s users are not actually active users, but essentially dummy accounts. Well, now Twitter is having similar issues regarding their reliability to advertisers, as the BarracudaLabs internet security blog tells of some pretty outstanding information and numbers regarding fake Twitter accounts. The difference with Twitter, however, is that there is really no question that it is not their fault. People see something as popular as Twitter and start thinking of how money can be made with it.

I’m sure, for you, the answer is advertising, but for some selling Twitter followers was the way to go. Jason Ding, the research scientist that wrote the BarracudaLabs blog post stated,

“For the past 75 days, we have been investigating the business of trading Twitter followers on eBay and other websites searched from Google. As it turns out, this underground economy on Twitter is blooming! The results show that this Twitter business is growing very fast to form a series of underground markets.”

People are trading phony accounts for their following value to one another like some sort of digital black market that they try to keep advertisers out of the loop on.

Anyway, Ding writes about the dealers themselves, who are the ones creating fake accounts and selling their followings. Throughout their searches, they found 20 sellers on eBay and an astounding 58 sellers within the top 100 pages of results in Google. Apparently, the standard pricing on these deals is around $18 for 1,000 followers. The thing is, it isn’t just followings that they are selling. Ding writes that,

“In addition to selling followings from these fake accounts, there are numerous opportunities for expansion into other services: selling tweets/re-tweets to earn additional profits.”

The internet security company found around 11,283 abusers, which are those people who buy followers to appear more popular or to use the accounts for selling ads. 53% of these abusers has 4,000-26,000 followers and there were 72,212 fake accounts found. On average, the fake accounts are recent, made within the past three months, but the oldest one found was made in 2007. They’ve been around for awhile and have apparently been regulated, be it by Twitter or by dealers trying to keep things organized.

These fake accounts can be used in many ways, including a few ways that can hurt advertisers and businesses quite a bit. Fake accounts will always confuse things, and maybe even screw people over in the process. Now that there is a market for fake Twitter accounts, there seems to be little hope of them disappearing any time soon. The fact is, for social networks to rid their sites of fake accounts is nearly impossible, and Twitter is not to blame. However, if something isn’t done about monitoring these fake accounts, advertisers may have to be watching their backs a bit while utilizing Twitter.

(InfoGraphic) QR Codes Make a Comeback in Q2

2

To put it simply, QR codes have always been sort of like 3D films. At first they were exciting and no one had ever seen anything like them. They were the epitome of what recent technology could do for advertising. Then, like 3D films, the excitement decreased significantly, and we barely heard anything about them. Now, though, I am sure you have noticed quite a few 3D movies making their way into the box office, just as QR codes have made a huge comeback, which is clear through the numbers from Q2 of 2012. ScanLife is one of the biggest, if not the true biggest name in QR code technology, and they have released some impressive numbers based on these codes for the second quarter of this year.

Through a well designed infographic, ScanLife reveals that results went up from 24 scans per minute in Q2 of 2011 to 120 scans per minute in Q2 of 2012. They stated that there were 4 million new people using ScanLife to scan QR codes in Q2, however there were a total of 5.3 million scans for the month of June alone. That’s the highest number of scans ever reported for a single month, which shows that QR codes seem to be making a substantial comeback. Especially since, in Q2 of 2011, the most successful QR code campaign brought a little more than 30,000 scans, while the most successful campaign of Q2 this year brought in over 2 million scans. These campaigns were those containing contests, social media content, app download content, or loyalty program information.

ScanLife has also mapped out in their illustration a breakdown of demographics based on age, gender, and operating system. The majority of scans are from male smartphone users at 69%, with females at31%. As is usual, the age groups that ring in the most scans, a combined total of 75%, are all 18-44. As for operating system, Android leads the way with 53% of the scans from Q2, an entire 10% ahead of Apple iOS. Another breakdown that ScanLife conducted was by industry. Leading the way in QR scans is the toy industry, then health and beauty businesses, and in third is the wireless industry. After those are the QSR and beverage industries, which did not do quite as well in the quarter. A final bit of valuable information that was released on the subject was the 60% of all QR code scanners did so right at home.

The best part about QR codes is that they can be used by just about anyone, and now that their success is growing to its highest points, advertising through these codes will become quite popular again. The QR numbers from Q2 also give some more insight into just how important mobile advertising is and will continue to be. With the help of ScanLife’s valuable QR and barcode information, advertisers can now feel confident about looking into code marketing.

Google+ has been Abandoned

18

The facts about Google+ are oscillating quite a bit these days from good news to bad. Not long ago, there was nothing but good news about Google+, but now people are calling it a “ghost town.” At least, that is what MarketingLand and Umpf are saying about it, based on information and a graphic that are presented in an Umpf blog post. Umpf, an online PR firm, did a small study about whether Google+ was really as popular as some people, including Google, make it seem sometimes. According to their infographic, Google+ may have a large number of user accounts, but in other areas their numbers are not at all impressive.

In their infographic, Umpf states that while Facebook has over 901 million users, Google+ only has about 170 million. However, that’s still above LinkedIn and Twitter in user accounts. So why are people calling it an abandoned network? Well, Umpf answers that question with their explanation of the number of users likely to share content per every 100 million users. In first place came Twitter with 197.3, followed by Facebook with 41.8, and LinkedIn with 15.2. In last place came Google+, with the mediocre average number of 6. So, compared to other social networks, Google has almost no users that are likely to share posts or other content.

Sharing isn’t really the first clue to a successful, active network though. The key factor is user activity within the network. Umpf reported in their graphic that LinkedIn is 2.5 times more active than Google+, Facebook is 7 times more active, and Twitter is a whole 33 times more active than Google’s social network. Also, after breaking down the statistics into different news sectors, Google+ is in the lowest percentage of each category. So, not only are people not really using Google+, but people aren’t really talking about it much either, meaning that its performance isn’t much to talk about.

In a few sentences, Umpf blog writer Adrian Johnson pretty much sums up what people need to know about Google+

“There’s been many articles written about how good, bad and indifferent Google+ is.  But our favourite debate is the ongoing It’s Really Popular Vs It’s A Ghost Town one. So what’s the truth?  Our findings and infographic (see below) appear to suggest the latter: despite its large number of accounts, G+ is bottom of the list of social network users’ favoured channels.”

Google+ seemed like it would be a huge hit, but these numbers (all received as official stats from each network) show that it just is not what Google tries making it out to be. There will still be arguments that say G+ is a great network for businesses and advertisers to show interest in, but Umpf tells us that that has never been the case. In social media marketing, it’s important to know the truth behind the networks themselves, especially if they are made out to be something they aren’t.

Facebook Throws A Huge Ad-Bone

2

There are many people that still are not to pleased or impressed with Facebook’s advertising efforts. Since they recently announced more mobile options, however, far more advertisers are starting to be intrigued with the way Facebook’s advertising will work with iOS and Android. So far, things have been going quite well for Facebook’s mobile endeavors. Now, things may be improving further, at least for app developers, as Facebook has just announced a few new options in application advertisement. One option pertains to mobile advertisement of apps, and the other new announcement is in regards to subscription to apps. The improvements will ultimately increase business for app developers both on and off of Facebook’s network.

Yesterday, Facebook announced on their developer’s blog that they had developed a new way for app developers to advertise on mobile platforms. Although it’s still in its beta testing stage, the mobile app advertising function promises to improve business with both iOS and Android developers. When a person clicks on one of these advertisements, if they haven’t installed the advertised app already, they are brought directly to Google Play or the Apple App Store. Setting up your advertisements is made easy as well. In Facebook’s App Dashboard, app developers simply choose their app and the audience they are targeting. After that, they can set a budget for their advertising campaign with Facebook’s mobile ads. Finally, they must choose a payment method and their ad campaign set up is complete. App developers will be able to advertise their latest creations right on mobile devices with ads that bring users directly to their apps in their respective application stores. It’s bound to be helpful, in that Vijaye Raji writes in the blog post,

 Facebook has increasingly become a way for iOS and Android developers to grow their apps. In the past 30 days, we have sent people to the Apple App Store and Google Play 146 million times, via clicks from channels such as news feed, timeline, bookmarks and App Center.

News for app developers regarding Facebook marketing opportunities did not stop there, however. There is now an option available to developers that allows them to rack up subscriptions through Facebook. The feature will let developers set prices on their apps, and give them the option to allow things like free trials or premium memberships. It’s a way to monetize applications that are developed for use on Facebook.com itself. Keeping track of transaction data and subscription earnings will also be easy now, thanks to Facebook’s recent API for subscriptions.

App developers are often struggling to effectively advertise their latest hits, so Facebook’s newest features will directly impact the amount business that developers receive. It seems that Facebook is trying to take care of everyone when it comes to marketing, and by giving app developers something to work with, they have done some good. Facebook will continue to become more efficient in their marketing efforts, helping all sorts of businesses, brands, and advertisers.

Does Facebook Mobile = Higher CTRs?

2

Not long ago, we all heard of Facebook’s big mobile ad launch, and advertisers were excited for yet another opportunity to advertise with the world’s most popular network. According to forecasts and professional opinions, the mobile Facebook ad platform would be one that would definitely improve Facebook’s name in marketing. So, how have these ads really been doing so far? Well, according to an article written today on MobiAD, a popular mobile marketing news website, it is starting to look like these numerous predictions about the ads were absolutely correct. The numbers have been good, and already the ads have outdone the desktop versions of Facebook marketing.

Based on a study of nearly 280 million ad impressions from four Facebook Ads API partners (TBG Digital, Nanigans, AdParlor, and Spruce Media), Facebook’s new mobile ads have done quite well. The study showed that sponsored stories on mobile platforms got more than 13 times the CTR and more than 11 times the eCPM of ads on Facebook’s desktop network. Also, these mobile Facebook ads have earned double the CTR and a little over 2.5 times the eCPM of web based Sponsored Stories from the network. In a provided chart on placement targeting, the CTR of desktop news feed ads were at .588%, while mobile news feed ads were at 1.140%. So, needless to say, mobile ads have been a breakthrough in the line of Facebook’s marketing techniques.

In a quote reported by MobiAd, Hussein Fazal, the CEO of AdParlor, stated:

By allowing advertisers to show ads only on mobile, Facebook is definitely going to be able to generate more revenue. We have seen a tonne of interest from advertisers who want to advertise just on mobile.

In another study conducted by another Facebook API partner, SocialCode, more insight was given into the increasing success of the mobile advertising of the social network. In a study of 7 million impressions, where desktop ads received well over 1 million impressions and mobile received a bit over 240,000, mobile received just under 500 more clicks than desktop ads did. For desktop ads, the CTR was at .099%, while the mobile ads had a CTR of .790%. One of SocialCode’s innovation officers, Addie Conner, stated that Facebook mobile ads have been so successful because of their thoughtful placement. She stated in an interview with MobiAd, “If you can make it an ad that users don’t hate, it’s actually extremely monetizable.”

Sure, there were reasonable doubts about Facebook’s mobile advertising, but those can all be put in the past, as it is pretty clear that Facebook’s mobile ads are pretty effective. Facebook has apparently been recently working on location-based ads, which is not an unfamiliar idea in the marketing world. They have been testing the location targeted advertisements for a while, and will probably release them in the relatively near future. Until then, Facebook’s mobile advertising will continue to be closely watched, and advertisers will probably start to see some great results from the network after a shaky advertising past.

True.com Bankrupt and Owes $100M

39

Unfortunately more bad news that will affect affiliate networks and affiliates. Mega-advertiser True Beginnings aka True.com has filed chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection in Texas Federal Court. True.com has long been a major advertiser in the affiliate space and made a name for itself in the industry for many of its overly sexy ads.

The really bad news is that, according to the filings it owes up to $100M to creditors in amounts from $1M to $10M. One can only assume that this includes several CPA Affiliate networks and publishers, many who had already entered into payment agreements with True.com after they failed to pay their bills.

A current search of CPA networks shows that more than a few CPA companies including EWA, ProfitKings Media and CPATrend are as of this writing, still running offers from True.com. One can assume that this bankruptcy filing has taken them by surprise.

According to the filing, there are at least 255 non-insider secured creditors owed, most of them unlikely to be paid what is owed, since the secure creditors, including the founder are owed as much a $61.5 Million.

The case is 4:12-bk-42061 in Texas Eastern Bankruptcy Court

——
Sponsored by React2Media
Pays All the Time. Backed by Adpepper!

(PMI-TV) Social Media Doesn’t Satisfy

1

GetSatisfaction CEO Wendy Lea talks about how social media, especially Facebook, is failing to drive conversions in the way that it could.  The problem is that brands and marketers are not able to take the conversation from their website to social media.  According to a study commissioned by GetSatisfaction, consumers are not using social networks to learn more about products, as they should, but still going to the company’s website.  You can download the report here.

Bouncing Visitors Kill Conversions

0

Having a high bounce rate can be frustrating. If you’re unaware of what exactly bounce rate refers to – it’s simply the number of visitors who landed on your page and left without exploring any other pages.

If you’re an online marketer that is looking out for long term results, you want your website to be interesting and compelling enough. You want your visitors to stay longer on your website and check out other pages as well.

A high bounce rate can be bad especially when you’re investing your hard-earned money into advertising and content creation. So how do you really go about working on lowering this rate? What measures can you take to ensure your site’s engaging enough?

You need to make a good first impression and see to it that your website doesn’t have any usability issues. This allows you to improve the visitor retention and helps you with your bounce rate issues.

Focus on Better Ad Placement

There is nothing wrong in running ads on your website. If you’ve got good content then your ads can bring you nice revenue. However, the cold hard truth is that people don’t like seeing excessive ads. If your page is drowning in advertisements then it’s going to be a definite turn off for your visitors.

This is why your ad placement needs to be intelligently planned out. If you’re going to have ads close to the website’s navigation or clutter up the opening part of your page then a lot of your visitors will be forced to leave. Work on having a clean look on your site and think from the visitor’s point of view.

Minimize the Third Party Content

If you want to spice up your website with third party widgets or content then you better do it smartly. Or else you’re going to slow down your pages. And if your pages load slow then you’ll have a hard time getting your visitors explore your site further.

People online have a short attention span and they don’t really have time to wait around. The solution to this is to have your website’s content load first and have the third party content load in the background. This way your visitors will immediately have access to the ‘meat’ and won’t feel like they’re facing a slow page.

Don’t Confuse Your Visitors

Any page that you drive traffic to on your site needs to be crystal clear about the message it’s giving out. Get to the point and don’t leave your visitors confused because it will lead to a high bounce rate.

The last thing you want is your visitor hunting for the information about the purpose of your website. You should communicate your message to your visitors through the content and as well as the design of your site.

You can do this by creating specific feature pages, having your content organized, using compelling headlines and of course having strong call to actions. That’s how you impress your visitors with your site’s clarity.

How do you work on bringing down your website’s bounce rate? What steps do you take to make your site more appealing? Please leave your comments in the box below.

Small Business Suck At This

3

Facebook has, in the past proven to be a very valuable tool for consumer engagement as the platform is so easily functional and Facebook traffic is quite enormous. That’s why any small business that exists now will create a page on Facebook, as to keep connected with their customers. However, according to a survey conducted by the online marketing tools provider Constant Contact, Inc. in Britain, small businesses have a totally different idea of how well Facebook is working for engagement purposes from what is the reality. Apparently small businesses were on the verge of giving up on Facebook, but they simply didn’t know what engagement marketing was or how it worked until this survey was released.

So, according to the study, 37 percent of those small business owners that use Facebook don’t see any way that the network has helped their businesses and only 21 percent of those asked were actually impressed with the things that they got from the site. However in their report of this survey, Constant Contact writes, “The data reveals several misconceptions that help to explain these attitudes, and shows that small businesses are actually doing a better job than they think.” The reason these small businesses aren’t impressed with their Facebook engagement performance is because they have no idea how to measure it, let alone how they’ve done it to begin with.

The funny thing is, without really knowing what they were doing, most of these businesses were implementing engagement tactics on accident. With 59 percent of those asked using Facebook for posting updates about products and services on their Timelines and 42 percent engaging with fans by responding to posts on their Timelines, businesses knew they were putting their company name out on the web, but were unaware of the value of engagement marketing. Still, though, 15 percent of the businesses asked used Facebook to offer vouchers and offers in exchange for likes, 14 percent for answer customer service problems, and 9 percent for conducting polls.

What really surprised these small businesses is the size of the package that engagement success arrived in. About 23 percent of those asked believed that in order to achieve engagement success, they needed at least 500 shares on any one post. Now, we know that’s not true, especially for smaller businesses with smaller customer bases. Regardless, though, 22 percent of respondents in the survey credited Facebook with attracting customers for their businesses and 12 percent say the network created repeat customers.

Constant Contact, Inc. believes that the reason for small businesses being disappointed with results is that they don’t have the proper methods of measuring their success. They are only unsatisfied because they are missing a lot of information that is valuable to measuring success. In their article, Constant Contact lists a few ways to see better results with Facebook and other social networks for those that are measuring results and are still unsatisfied. Small businesses would be happier with the benefits of their Facebook efforts if they were to simply pay better attention to the results.

Wildfire: The Importance of Active Fans

1

In social media marketing, every fan or follower counts in some way or another. Each one counts as another step closer to successful marketing in the social world. Of course, there are some fans that are much more influential for brands than others. Social media is all about sharing information from one person to the next, and there are some fans of products and brands that earn a lot more media for the business than most others. The social media marketing company Wildfire that was recently purchased by Google released some data showing how important it can be for businesses to engage their biggest fans on social platforms.

Wildfire’s data statistics showed how sharing can significantly boost earned media numbers. They reported that with every sharer cam around 14 earned media impressions being generated. Also, brand can impact engagement levels through sharing, as good sharer engagement has led to three times more comments or likes on company and brand pages. Furthermore, with every 10 new joiners that a brand receives, there comes an average of 13 more people engaging with clicks or other interactions. Clearly, the more influential fans on pages should be priority one, as they can very easily affect the total number of fans an advertiser’s page receives.

After analyzing 10,000 brands and advertisers that were partaking in social media marketing campaigns on Facebook, Wildfire narrowed the numbers down to the 10 percent of brands that were considered the top performers. For that top 10%, the user breakdown was weighted toward joiners for the most part. 61% of users that engaged with these top brands were those who simply joined their pages, 34.3% were those who shared page content, and 4.7% of users were advocates. Compared to the rest of the brands’ pages that were analyzed, the top performing 10 percent showed 20% more sharers and at least 3% more advocates.

During a press release, Wildfire CEO and founder Victoria Ransom stated,

“This data clearly shows that brands need to be focused on nurturing their most active fans, particularly their brand advocates,” said Victoria Ransom, CEO and Founder at Wildfire.  “Brands should give users a variety of ways to engage with them — and several options for what to do when they get there — to increase time spent on the page as well as return activity.  Brands should also give users specific instructions about what to do to engage.  For example, if you want someone to ‘Like’ your post, it helps to directly ask for it.”

Wildfire’s data shows that, in order to create more engagement in social media, attention should be paid to those users who have already engaged with your business page. The most influential sharers for a particular business’s page hold a lot of power that brands should embrace. The impact of the most active fans for any business in social media can be huge, and managing these users is a smart way to improve user engagement. Surely, the brands that have already taken action with more active fans have seen satisfactory results.

Facebook Comments Equal Compliance Issues?

0

Facebook comments have, for a long time, been used for engagement between consumers and advertisers or brands. Now, it seems that many advertisers are considering these comments to be a form of advertisement for their businesses. When people visit a Facebook page, they don’t simply read posts and view images, but they pay attention to the comments that people are leaving on these posts and images. Because people have always been able to write whatever they want in comments, there new role as advertisements for businesses could mean trouble. However, there has come a way to prevent disaster through comments, according to The Sydney Morning Herald of Sydney, Australia and WebProNews.

In the SMH, media writer Julian Lee wrote,

“In a move that could change the nature of the social networking site forever, companies could be fined or publicly shamed for the comments that appear on their Facebook ”brand” pages. Last month the advertising industry watchdog issued a judgment in which it said comments made by ”fans” of a vodka brand’s Facebook page were ads and must therefore comply with industry self-regulatory codes and therefore consumer protection laws.”

Based on Julian’s writing, it appears that there are those out there making an effort to crack down on explicit or offensive comments on business pages. At least, that’s what has started taking place across the globe.

In an article by writer Josh Wolford of WebProNews, he states that companies will have to be increasingly vigilant with their page and post comments as they grow as a source of advertisement. The more people start basing their opinions and making decisions about businesses based on comment advertisements, the more important it is to weed out the bad comments and leave the good, especially since it is possible that companies will become liable for claims that commenters make on their own.

It isn’t quite a form of reputation management, although comments are also being considered as reviews by many consumers. The comments in question are those that speak of products and services in certain ways, some of which come from those who are not completely aware of the true facts. Therefore, false advertising is falling out of the hands of businesses, and consumer comments can potentially cause trouble. An example that WPN provided was as follows:

“Let’s say someone left a comment saying that Taco Bell’s beefy 5-layer burrito is the most healthy fast food item out there, and that he lost weight and stayed in shape by eating six a day – Taco Bell would be responsible for removing the comment because it is false advertising.”

Since comments are often posted in numbers upwards of a thousand per day on big name brands, it will not be easy to find the ones that are really doing damage and take care of them. It is for that reason that companies will need to start paying more attention to the false advertising taking place in their comments alongside managing their own names on Facebook.

Get Deadbeat CPA Networks to Pay You!

0

By now, we all know the value of working with a trustworthy network. Unfortunately, many networks and affiliates continue to lose substantial revenue to networks that do not pay.

Given that the performance marketing space is highly litigious and constantly undergoing regulatory change, it may be impossible to eliminate risk, but there are some ways to substantially decrease risk and potentially recover some ground. Adhering to or taking action on the following list should help you do just that.

“Where there’s smoke, there’s fire”

You’ve likely heard the expression “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” Well, if you don’t feel like getting burned, you should probably shy away when you see some clear warning signs (smoke). When trying to evaluate whether there is a potential risk with a given company, look for some clear signs of danger.

First and most importantly, you need to take a look and see whether there are others who are not being paid out. Not being paid on time means not being paid at all (after all, until you receive it, it’s not late – you simply haven’t been paid). I’m not suggesting that you hit the panic button if you read one random anonymous story online – we all know that there is a high level of competition online and companies will stop at nothing to damage each other publicly, so beware. However, if you do happen to discover that several others may be having payment issues with the same company, you should never make the assumption that it won’t happen to you. As a matter of fact, you should assume that it will happen to you very soon. Let’s stick with the “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” expression – when others are not being paid, that’s like seeing a neighbor’s house burning to the ground. At the least, it’s time to start taking defensive measures.

Second, many networks and affiliates fail to follow or properly understand what is happening in the legal world. If a company is engaged in (or has recently gone through) litigation, you need to understand how severe it is or may be. The first step is to look for companies who are or have been engaged in “serious” litigation! Sometimes companies are squabbling over an amount that either one of them can cover without any serious consequence – it may seem petty to the rest of us, it may really even be petty, but they have their reasons and these aren’t the cases you need to worry about.

Other times, a company is being hit by a heavy-handed player (a large company or a federal governing body) – when this happens you need to perk up and focus your attention on what is happening. The industry rarely yields a fairytale story; if a company is about to go out of business or sees that they are going to lose a devastating lawsuit, no company is going to give you a heads-up that they are going out of business. More often than not, they’ll either pack up whatever they have remaining for themselves and call it a day (as we’ve seen happen on a few occasions recently) or fight it out and lose more than they can afford to.

Within this line of thinking, you need to understand that a settlement is not a good thing, it’s simply not as bad as it’s alternative. While settlements are obviously better than their alternatives, they are not “good things.” When it comes to the term settlement, the corporate world has done a good job of making an ugly thing look pretty. When a company reaches an agreement or settles, they do so at a price. For affiliates, that means that their (the defendant negotiating a settlement) freedom may come at your expense. Most settlement agreements within our space require that a company deliver reporting and compliance items on their network, which they otherwise would not have to deliver. This may compromise a network’s (or an affiliate’s) privacy and ability to do business. What’s more is that companies may not only pay a flat fine, they may have to pay a percentage of their earnings in perpetuity (meaning they may need to cut out a piece of their revenue for as long as they exist). When this happens, it decreases their bottom line and may lead to them folding up shop one day. It’s hard enough for a lot of businesses in our space to succeed without any hurdles – when you add heavy fines, percentages of future revenue being cut and some strict reporting guidelines, it can easily spell the end.

Finally, the basics tend to get overlooked at an alarming rate. Here are some quick points that should serve as a reminder whenever you’re considering working with a company.

  • How long have they been in business? A track record should be the first thing you look for.
  • Is it an established company or something being run out of a basement / dorm room? How a company sets up can be suggestive of whether they’re in it for the short term or long haul.
  • Have they been recognized by any major bodies within the space or external to it? While it’s nice to make a websites “top list” that doesn’t qualify for much when you’re paying for it. Being recognized outside of our immediate space can tell you a bit.
  • Is the company on a positive trend? In recent years, my company has been accompanied by a few others in our space that have made the Inc. 500 list as America’s fastest growing private companies (we ranked 40th in 2011). Making this list or any other lists that examine the health of a business can help.
  • Is it too good to be true? If what you’re seeing is just too good to be true (payouts are far too high) and there is no logic (there’s often a good explanation for high payouts) whatsoever – be weary.

Finally, if you do feel that you are in trouble, you should always consider obtaining legal council. My company is represented by the best in the business because we invest in limiting risk. If you’re owed $50k and can’t get paid, look at your potential legal costs as an insurance policy. Let’s assume you pay out $3k in legal costs before recouping what is owed to you. That only equates to 6 percent of what you were owed, which leaves 94 percent in your pocket. (Each situation will call for different measures of course but give it some thought before making your decision).

Remember, it’s not about whether you were unlucky enough to get burned or not. You have the ability to create your own luck more often than not.

Be safe and be smart.

 

Are Most CPA Networks Stable?

0

In this episode of PMI-TV, Murray Newlands interviews Keren Marom the VP of Media at the Israel mega-advertising company Matomy Media. She discusses about how networks are all not good for all networks and that affiliates must do some research on networks before working with networks — not all networks have money in the bank.

You can go here to more about the Matomy Media Group Promotion

Data, Dance, and Daring Campaigns: Erin Levzow’s Approach to Building Loyalty

0
How Mango Habanero, Metrics, and Masterful Moves Redefined Marketing Genius Every so often, a guest comes along who doesn’t just raise the bar—they throw it into orbit. Erin Levzow is one of those guests. From the moment she joined The ADOTAT Show, it was clear we were in the presence of brilliance. Erin is a marketing powerhouse, blending emotional intelligence with razor-sharp strategy, all wrapped in a package of humor, humility, and dazzling storytelling. She’s the...

Streaming’s Big Lie: The Future of TV Is Already Broke

0
Streaming was supposed to be the savior of TV—the rebellious new kid with no commercials, endless content, and an open bar of binge-worthy dopamine hits. But, as Doug Shapiro’s sharp, no-BS research reveals, the revolution is out of cash and looking for a loan. Streaming doesn’t just monetize less—it barely monetizes at all. For every streaming dollar generated, old-school pay TV is making it rain with three dollars in subscriber fees and seven dollars...

How to Narrow the Scope of Information Sought by an FTC Civil Investigative Demand (CID)

0
A civil investigative demand (“CID”) is the instrument by which the Federal Trade Commission exercises its compulsory process authority in connection with investigations.  CIDs may require the production of documents - including electronically stored information – or tangible things, the provision of testimony, and the providing of written responses to questions. A CID must state the nature of the conduct constituting the alleged violation which is under investigation and the provision of law applicable to...

Did Your Company Receive a Letter From the FTC?  FTC Warning Letters and Notices of Penalty Offense

0
Recipients of FTC warning letters and notices of penalty offense should be on high alert and act quickly. Their advertising and marketing practices could be in violation of applicable legal regulations. What is an FTC Warning Letter? Federal Trade Commission “warning letters” are intended to warn companies that their conduct is likely unlawful and that they can face serious legal consequences, such as a federal investigation or lawsuit, if they do not immediately stop. ...

The Good, the Bad, and the SPO-ly

0
The Hidden Flaws Behind Ad Tech’s Favorite Buzzword. Supply Path Optimization (SPO) is my love-hate relationship in ad tech personified. It’s the reason I fell for this industry’s maddening brilliance—and why it sometimes feels like a bad rom-com where no one learns their lesson. At its core, SPO promises efficiency, transparency, and accountability, and when it works, it’s like watching a Rube Goldberg machine perform flawlessly. But when it doesn’t—and let’s be honest, that’s most...