Sunday, December 10, 2023
Lawyers Run The WorldSupreme Court Discusses Expectations of Facebook Privacy

Supreme Court Discusses Expectations of Facebook Privacy


- Advertisment -spot_img

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Riley v. California case last week, and in them, the privacy settings of Facebook were discussed.  The case involves a San Diego college student, David Riley.  He was pulled over for driving on expired tags, when the police seized his phone.  They went through the phone, finding a photo on it that linked him to participating in a drive-by shooting, which he was later convicted for.

Jeffrey L. Fisher, who is representing Riley, argued that going through photos on a smartphone requires that the police draw on data which is ‘intrinsically intertwined’ in the device, which is protected by the Fourth Amendment.

This case will shape what privacy protections Americans will have against warrantless searches of electronic devices in the future.  Since this is the first case the Supreme Court has looked at which is dealing with this very specific scenario, it will be used as a precedent for future cases.  This type of situation has the potential to happen to virtually anyone, at any time, due to the fact that people store so much information on their mobile phones, and the apps on them.

Chief Justice John Roberts discussed the specifics of the privacy expectations of information on the phones, and in apps like Facebook.  He asked regarding the expectation of privacy whether it was, “including information that is specifically designed to be made public? I mean, what about something like Facebook or a Twitter account?”

Roberts said that there isn’t “any privacy interest” in a Facebook account, or that it is “at least diminished because the point is you want these things to be public and seen widely.”

Of course, there is a lot of areas on Facebook which are indeed private.  Facebook messenger, for example, is a private conversation between just two people.  In addition, many posts are only available to the specific individuals who are given access (the user’s “friends”). Fisher explained this noting that, “Even a Facebook account is a limited universe of people who have access to it.”

Justice Roberts seemed hesitant to accept this argument, saying “I mean, you know, maybe it’s a hundred people, but it’s certainly not private in the sense that many other application are.”

An argument could easily be made (and may be made in this case) that if activity on Facebook were not private, the Police wouldn’t need to look on an individual’s device to access it.  They could simply access it publically through the normal Facebook network.  On the other hand, if police can’t access it through a normal Facebook account, that may imply privacy rights.

These were just the opening oral arguments, and this case may have a long way to go.  It is certainly something all of us will want to keep an eye on, as it could affect what types of privacy rights we enjoy on our electronic devices.

Pesach Lattin
Pesach Lattin
Pesach "Pace" Lattin is one of the top experts in interactive advertising, affiliate marketing. Pesach Lattin is known for his dedication to ethics in marketing, and focus on compliance and fraud in the industry, and has written numerous articles for publications from MediaPost, ClickZ, ADOTAS and his own blogs.

What's your opinion?

Latest news

Yahoo Rises from the Digital Ashes: An AI Comeback Tale

Silicon Valley giants and plucky startups alike vie for the spotlight in the adtech world but a familiar name...

Billion-Dollar Blindspots: The ANA Report’s Eye-Opening Revelations

In the complex world of digital advertising, the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) has released a groundbreaking report, shedding...

Streaming TV’s Power Couple: FreeWheel and Index Exchange Join Forces

This era is definitely characterized by the rapid and transformative growth of streaming television, and the advertising and programmatic...

The Partnership Pioneers:’s Game-Changing Year in Review

As 2023 sketched its vibrant narrative, dazzled as a trailblazer in the realm of international performance marketing and...

The Great Attribution Illusion: A Marketer’s Modern-Day Haunting

Attribution in marketing is a specter that haunts the digital corridors with promises and pitfalls alike—a phantom stitched together...

Roblox Roulette: Why Some Brands Win, and Others Just Lose

A common misconception continues to lure brands into treacherous waters: the belief that mere presence guarantees relevance, and relevance,...

Must read

The Partnership Pioneers:’s Game-Changing Year in Review

As 2023 sketched its vibrant narrative, dazzled as...

The Great Attribution Illusion: A Marketer’s Modern-Day Haunting

Attribution in marketing is a specter that haunts the...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you