Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 1162

New Opportunity with Instagram for Marketers

3

Most of the social networks that are of some sort of use to marketers have one very crucial feature in common. Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and even Google+ have all incorporated a feed of activity from friends, brands and businesses where users end up spending most of their time. For a while now, Instagram has been emerging as one of today’s more popular social networks, but they have always been a primarily mobile service. Sure, the company has a feed, but they have never really gotten to the point that they brought this feature to the web. With Instagram creating Web Profiles for its users relatively recently, we got a glimpse of the company’s plans for the future. Now, Instagram has reached the point of all of today’s other popular networks, and has a feed present on both mobile and desktop internet platforms.

Today, I’m very excited to announce the launch of a product we’ve been wanting to build for quite some time now. Since our launch in October of 2010, we’ve focused on building a simple app that has inspired creativity while capturing everyday moments through the lens of your mobile phone. In fact, our focus on building out a mobile-only experience is a unique path that we’ve chosen for many reasons, the most important of which is that Instagram, at its core, is about seeing and taking photos on-the-go. However, to make Instagram even more accessible to our growing community, at the end of last year we started to expand to the desktop web, giving you the ability to see profiles from instagram.com. To continue that path, as of today, you can now browse your Instagram feed on the web – just like you do on your mobile device. Go to instagram.com and log in to your account to give it a try.

The desktop version of the Instagram image feed is almost identical to that you would find in the mobile app. The only differences in functionality that I can see are that Instagram has denied the desktop version of the Explore tab as well as the News tab. Other than that, users can still use Instagram as they always have, only on a bigger screen.

If the company does follow suit with other well-known social networks, we should probably expect to start seeing advertising options that go hand in hand with a desktop social feed. This is especially likely considering the huge influence that Facebook has on the network since Instagram was acquired by the company late last year.

Aside from showing the potential for Instagram to become a fantastic marketing destination, the addition of a desktop version of the network’s feed shows that the company has progressed and grown. Originally, the network was to remain a completely mobile experience, but Instagram has reached the point where users need much more than that as far as functionality. It is easy to predict that users will love the addition of an online feed, and hopefully we will see some advertising offerings from the company soon.

Try Click to Call With Bing

3

As the popular phrase says, “If you can’t beat them, join them.” Bing made big attempts for a while to create bigger and better things than Google, but the company just could not pick up the slack. Now it seems clear that Bing has accepted its fate of staying behind Google in the online search and search marketing industries. For a while now, we have seen Bing coming out with features and services similar to those we see with Google’s AdWords platform. For example, Microsoft recently announced product listing ads for Bing, much like those shown on Google. The company is trying to catch up, and now Bing will be releasing another new advertising feature in an attempt to level out the market.

Among the many offerings from Google AdWords, one thing marketers can find the option to use is a click-to-call feature that they can include within their advertising efforts. Now, according to WebProNews, Bing will be including a click-to-call ad format, which will be the direct result of two of Microsoft’s properties, Bing and Skype partnering up.

With Skype being so widely used for video and online calling, WebProNews reports the new ad format will be available on mobile and tablets, as well as on the PC.

From WebProNews,

Skype already has a click to call offering, but it doesn’t actually show an ad for the business. ‘Instead when the Skype plug-in is installed in the users’ browser on a PC, and the business listing is appearing organically on any web page, then it allows the user to click on the listing on the webpage to call that business for free using Skype,’ explains Microsoft.

The new click-to-call ads for Bing will be much more like the ones we are used to seeing on other search platforms. The option will appear in the ads of advertisers, allowing for both to appear to the consumer. Along with the feature of course will be an analytics feature to measure the performance of click-to-call ads on Bing.

These types of ads are usually best for mobile search ads, rather than those on PC. Google elaborates on this in their overview of their click-to-call ads.

When people are searching for goods or services on their mobile phones, they often prefer to call a business rather than visit its website. Now you can make it even easier for potential customers to get in touch with you by adding a clickable business phone number in ads that appear on mobile devices with full internet browsers.

It is inevitable that Bing would try to keep things even with its biggest competitor, knowing that the company is unlikely to take a huge lead. So, by imitating that marketing moves of Google, Bing has a better chance of seeing some of the success that their competitor sees.  However, Bing hopes that they are right in saying that they can do things better.

Facebook Users Losing Interest?

5

With all the marketers that advertise within Facebook today, the average, everyday Facebook user is paid a lot of attention. These social marketers need Facebook users in order for their marketing efforts to be a success. After all, the entire social experience depends on people to make it work. With Facebook recently hitting the billion user mark, Facebook marketers have not had much reason to worry about lack of traffic. The immense traffic is a huge reason marketers flock to Facebook, as it simply increases their chances for successful performance marketing. Now though, a report is showing signs that people are starting to give up on Facebook to venture to other unique social media experiences.

The report comes from the Pew Internet and American Life Project, and it presents a pretty straight forward chart. The chart shows the plans of people in the age groups of 18-29, 30-49, and 50+, regarding the amount of time they will spend on Facebook in the year ahead. In the 18-29 age group, the majority said that their time on Facebook will not change, at 61%. Then, 38% of this age group said that they planned to spend less time on the network. Only 1% of these people said they want to spend more time on Facebook. For the 30-49 age group, 69% said they will spend the same amount of time, 26% said less, and 4% said more. Finally, for the 50+ respondents, 78% will retain the same amount of time, 17% will spend less time, and 4% will spend more.

  • 61% of current Facebook users say that at one time or another in the past they have voluntarily taken a break from using Facebook for a period of several weeks or more.
  • 20% of the online adults who do not currently use Facebook say they once used the site but no longer do so.
  • 8% of online adults who do not currently use Facebook are interested in becoming Facebook users in the future.

So, although the company in the past has made it seem like all sunshine and good news, it seems that social users are as excited about the network as Facebook has led us to believe. When asked about why these 61% of users took breaks from Facebook for weeks at a time, here are some of the responses Pew received.

Some of the verbatim thoughts from those who took Facebook breaks include the following: “I was tired of stupid comments.” …  “[I had] crazy friends. I did not want to be contacted.” … “I took a break when it got boring.” …  “It was not getting me anywhere.” …  “Too much drama.” … “You get burned out on it after a while.” … “I gave it up for Lent.” … “I was fasting.” … “People were [posting] what they had for dinner.” …  “I didn’t like being monitored.” … “I got harassed by someone from my past who looked me up.”…  “I don’t like their privacy policy.” … “It caused problems in my [romantic] relationship.”

Clearly, Facebook users are having quite a few issues with Facebook. As the site sees more and more use, it may be getting a bit worn out for users. Of course, marketers should not worry yet about the loss of Facebook users, but if the company decides to make no changes to help users stay excited there could potentially be an issue.

WhatRunsWhere and Advertising Red Books Launch Data Sharing Partnership

0

Agreement Enables Both Companies to Provide Users with More Detailed Competitive Ad Intelligence

SAN DIEGO / NEW YORK – WhatRunsWhere (www.whatrunswhere.com), the service that enables advertisers and ad agencies to track competitors’ online and mobile ad campaigns, has partnered with Advertising Red Books (www.redbooks.com), the venerable source on advertiser and agency relationships, personnel and billing information, to share selected data for their respective users.

WhatRunsWhere users researching a particular advertiser will now receive a brand description from Red Books, as well as contact information, number of employees, revenue and the name and title of a marketing or sales executive.  Conversely, when Red Books users look up an advertiser, they will see examples of several of the brand’s current online display and text ads via WhatRunsWhere.

“With the addition of essential corporate information from such a highly regarded and trusted industry resource as Red Books, advertisers and agencies can now rely on WhatRunsWhere to develop a more detailed picture of their competitors’ online advertising activities and strategies,” said Mike Cojanu, chief executive officer of WhatRunsWhere.  “In addition to knowing what web and mobile ads are running, and where, WhatRunsWhere users can now easily learn more about the companies behind those ads.”

“For over 100 years, the advertising and media industry has continually relied on Red Books for up-to-date data and insights surrounding all players in the agency and advertiser industry,” said Sameer Jagetia, President of Advertising Red Books.  “Thanks to this new partnership with WhatRunsWhere, users will now see a fresh perspective on the expanding online ad space with a real-time sampling of marketer-specific online ads.”

About Advertising Red Books

Advertising Red Books (www.redbooks.com) is the most comprehensive, up-to-date lead generation and competitive intelligence tool in the advertising & media industry.  For over 100 years, Red Books has had immediate impact on the work of media, publishing, agency, sales and marketing teams, providing the key information they need for sales leads and research. Updated daily, the database and profiles include 100,000 brands (within 20,000 advertisers), 15,000 agencies, 200,000 key contacts, 100,000 direct emails, client lists, agency-advertiser relationships, sales/annual billings, and much more.

About WhatRunsWhere

WhatRunsWhere (www.whatrunswhere.com), a competitive intelligence service for online media buying, allows users to look up what advertisers are doing online, including mobile: where they are running ads, from who they are buying inventory, and what exact ads they are using. WhatRunsWhere also allows users to see what is happening on any online publisher: who is advertising there, who is selling the inventory, and what ads are running. With data from multiple countries and actionable insights from the data, WhatRunsWhere allows users to quickly dissect competitive online advertising campaigns, resulting in reduced risk and a higher ROI.

TranDotCom’s Integration with CPA Detective Changes the Lead Buying Landscape

0

TranDotCom completes integration with Gold Partner CPA Detective to offer superior lead fraud detection to clients.

CPA Detective’s industry leading technology now allows lenders to boost ROI by making smarter real-time lead buying decisions.

KENNESAW, GA – February 4, 2013 – TranDotCom (TDC) Solutions announces today a new integration partnership with CPA Detective, to enhance its industry-leading set of services to the online lending industry.

CPA Detective’s predictive scoring technology identifies leads that have been recycled multiple times from past campaigns and were fraudulently re-submitted by the lead source. This is achieved by leveraging real-time fraud intelligence based on the digital forensic data captured from millions of visitors forming the largest fraudulent IP address database in the affiliate marketing industry. CPA Detective’s technology has been proven to increase ROI – lenders using the service avoid purchasing fraudulent leads that are 6x less likely to convert and 2x more likely to default.

Through a seamless integration, lenders can easily make real-time decisions about purchasing a lead and even avoid buying leads from sources associated with fraudulent activity. They can then track statistics about traffic sources through CPA Detective’s interface to identify fraudulent patterns and get details about each lead submitted.

“CPA Detective’s technology is forward thinking and has a direct effect upon our customer’s bottom line,” said TranDotCom President Chris Carson. “The industry has been looking for a product to help curtail fraudulent lead volume for quite some time and the CPA Detective team has put together an impressive solution. The integration within our Loan Management System offers our clients access to a unified platform that can’t be found anywhere else. ”

David Sendroff, President of CPA Detective, added “We are excited to bring CPA Detective’s game changing technology to lenders on TranDotCom’s industry-leading platform. This partnership truly creates a best of breed solutions for online lenders. TranDotCom clients can now add unparalleled transparency to the lead buying process, all in real-time with minimal integration efforts.”

Interested in learning more about CPA Detective’s solutions and how you can take advantage of the partnership? Contact TranDotCom toll free at 866-735-6862 or via email at sales@tdcemail.com.

About TranDotCom Solutions, LLC
TranDotCom Solutions is a leader in automated consumer finance transaction processing, providing a full range of consulting, software, support and transaction processing services which allow lenders to be more competitive and highly efficient. TranDotCom Solutions understands and specializes in all of the components of consumer finance lending including payday advance, installment and line-of-credit products. TranDotCom pioneered the industry’s first web-based transaction management system and has been processing transactions since 2000, supporting storefront and online lenders in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. TranDotCom may be reached at 866-735-6862 or sales(at)tdcemail.com.

About CPA Detective
CPA Detective is the premier lead fraud detection solution proven to increase marketing ROI and maximize campaign efficiency for lead buyers across all verticals including financial services, insurance, and education. CPA Detective allows companies to make intelligent lead buying decisions by leveraging advanced lead scoring algorithms, smart device fingerprinting, and an industry-wide Fraud Intelligence Database to provide greater transparency into the quality of each lead and the overall traffic source. Learn more at http://www.cpadetective.com or call 877-449-1854.

Contact: Brian Gustason

Russell Rockefeller Ripped Me Off $5,000

30

Someone in my AIM friend list asked me to join Super Affiliates group on Facebook owned by Russell Rockefeller. That was when I came in touch with Russell and added him. He obviously believes in ostentatious display of his knowledge, wealth and carries this aura of being a millionaire-kind of attitude. He told me he is a pro-emailer and one of the best in the industry. So I thought of him as a very successful guy who achieved these heights just because of his hard-work, knowledge and contacts.

He once posted on his fb group that he is willing to teach people how to be a pro-mailer. Only limited slots left. I was in awe of him and thought it would be worth an investment. So I joined his program, wired him $11,000 and started daily sessions over Skype for couple of weeks. All of a sudden one day he blocked me in the middle of a session. I thought, he might be having some personal reasons and that’s why he is not online but then after a week’s time, I saw that he deleted me from his linkedin connections and facebook friends list. That’s when I thought something is fishy. I had no clue why he was behaving this way. I asked a common friend if she can check out with Russell online over skype. She asked him about me. He obviously didn’t want to look bad about this whole episode. Russell told her that I tried to “hack” into his system and that’s why he has blocked me and that I have done something which is against his company’s policy.

I was really shocked to hear that. I tried every possible way to contact him- Facebook, Skype, email and phone but he was completely unresponsive to everything. I never heard back from him that’s when I decided that people must know about him and I wanted them to decide who is at fault. So I posted about it online in every facebook group related to affiliate marketing I was part of. It raised few eyebrows. Despite all this there was no response from him. So I decided to post this whole story on MailerForum.com. That’s when he started replying to the thread and admitted that he might have done this by mistake and probably it wasn’t me, it was someone else who tried to hack him.

He was neither interested in explaining me anything nor had any intentions of paying my money back. But his own response on mailerforum thread backfired on him and he asked me to discuss it privately on facebook. He then offered to pay me $6000 only on one condition that I will quietly take down all these threads without trying to get any attention. Trust me it wasn’t worth loosing $5000 and that still hurts.

Anyways, I accepted it because I wanted to ensure that I get some part of my money back from him.

I accept that he paid me $6k back because of all the pressure I had built around him else I am sure he won’t have paid me a penny back. I can say this because few more people told me similar stories about how they were ripped off by Russell in past.  (Trent Silver from Capstone leads and Charles Woolverton from ClickOfficial.com. These guys too were never paid and when they tried to contact him, he told them to go and f*** themselves). He asked me that he will just pay me $6k and if I want I can ask for remaining amount from his partner, the owner of OptinPlus.com. The break-down of the payments were never mentioned in the agreement. So in case of dispute it becomes his responsibility to pay me back. His partner was never involved anywhere. In fact, I didn’t even knew that he had a partner.

Many people told me that he is an old time and has been doing such things for years. He behaves very weirdly at times, no disrespect to his knowledge and achievements (if there are any). It’s just that people feel ashamed coming forward to report such things. After all, people would only laugh at me that I paid $11k only to learn how to mail? I was offered 2 months of data-feeds and Emailing platform as an add-on to this course.

The reason why I wanted to share this thing with everyone was to make sure that they don’t pay such people. Not everyone makes $10k in a day like him. It’s a big money and the last thing people want to pay them to people like Russell who goes around with a millionaire tag and thinks nobody would come out in open to report his activities, after all, he is in this industry since last 20 years. But I am really very thankful to all members of MailerForum for their support. I am sure nobody would have believed me without their support.

P.S. It’s not a crime to make mistakes. Best of us make mistakes in life. Russell is not my enemy. I still respect his achievements and knowledge but that doesn’t give him any right to de-fraud people this way. Time in again he blocks people this way and comes out with “against my company’s policy” explanation when they question him. Let’s make sure he doesn’t do that with anyone again ever.

 

 

Regulators Still Enforcing Health Marketing Claims

0
The FTC Building

The Federal Trade Commission and numerous state Attorneys’ General continue to actively police deceptive health-related marketing claims, including those relating to weight loss products.  Marketers in the know evaluate products and related data first, and then create advertising copy to reflect what the product has actually been proven to do.

Make no mistake about it, there is a higher standard for substantiating health and weight loss claims for dietary supplements.  Regulators require “competent and reliable scientific evidence.”

In case you have not studied the myriad of available consent judgments regarding weight loss claims, “competent and reliable scientific evidence” means well-controlled human clinical studies of the product, or of an essentially equivalent product, conducted by different researchers, independently of each other, that conform to acceptable designs and protocols and whose results, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable scientific evidence, are sufficient to substantiate that the representations are true.

Essentially equivalent is, in turn, defined as a product that contains the identical ingredients, except for inactive ingredients (e.g., colors and fillers), in the same form and dosage, and with the same route of administration, as the covered product — provided that the covered product may contain additional ingredients if reliable scientific evidence generally accepted by experts in the field demonstrates that the amount and combination of additional ingredients is unlikely to impede or inhibit the effectiveness of the ingredients in the essentially equivalent product.

As referenced above, regulators will, without a doubt, consider whether existing studies are indeed consistent with the body of scientific evidence.  The FTC is increasingly looking for consensus within the scientific community.

The foregoing standards are set forth with specificity in numerous regulatory settlement orders and should be considered a baseline enforcement threshold.  So, such clinical studies will have to be conducted on the product or on a substantially equivalent product, and conform to rigorous protocol and design standards.

It is unlikely that the FTC will accept ingredient testing unless the advertising makes very clear that the efficacy claims being made are limited to the ingredients rather than the product.  All those in the stream of commerce, from advertisers to publishers, should be careful not to make express or implied claims that the product has been proven or tested absent well-controlled clinical studies.

Further, marketers must not simply rely upon conclusions in clinical studies.  Rather, a careful review of relevant protocols and data is imperative to ensure consistency with scientific conclusions.

Another common mistake continues to be that testimonials from satisfied customers will do the trick to get around the substantiation requirement.  They will not.  Testimonials are not “competent and reliable scientific evidence.”  Unless you are comfortable with the likelihood of a regulator pulling compliance threads, do not try an end-around of the requirement through a testimonial.

If you do not have reliable data to prove the underlying representation, do not make it in the first place.  Consumer testimonials inherently involve making efficacy claims that have to be substantiated.  Whether your advertisement says “Lose 10 pounds…” or “I lost 10 pounds…,” competent scientific substantiation to back-up the claims is required.

The overall net impression of ad copy upon a reasonable consumer is what counts.  Other red-flag weight loss claims that are almost always considered deceptive include, without limitation, that a product can cause weight loss without diet or exercise or can cause permanent weight loss.

If the disclosure of information is necessary to prevent an advertisement from being considered deceptive, it must be made clearly and conspicuously.  A miniscule, fine-print footnote below the fold will not mitigate potentially liability and is arguably tantamount to having no disclosure at all.

The relationship between the principle claims and disclosures is vitally important when assessing marketing do’s and don’ts.  For more information on the science of maintaining conversions while substantiating claims and product efficacy, consult with an advertising law attorney.  It is often more cost-effective to involve regulatory compliance counsel early on in the creative compliance process.

Those that are engaged in campaigns within high-risk verticals are well-advised to assume that they are being carefully monitored.  Regulators methodically scour the Internet for problematic ad copy.  Methodologies and underlying protocols of clinical studies upon which all those in the stream of commerce are relying promises to remain front-and-center for quite some time.

Do not stand out unless you are fully compliant or have a high level of risk tolerance.  If you draft aggressive ad copy first and the try to gather reliable studies that conform to it, you are asking for trouble.

Information conveyed in this article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute, nor should it be relied upon, as legal advice. This information is not intended to substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. No person should act or rely on any information in this article without seeking the advice of an attorney.

Twitter Mentioned in 50% of Super Bowl Ads

2

Today, it has gotten to the point where a massive amount of people watching the Super Bowl are just as excited for the advertisements as they are the actual game itself. The Super Bowl is one of the only days of the year where viewers actually get really excited for commercial breaks. Not only is it the perfect time for a bathroom break, but it is when advertisers get to show their true colors to the public when it comes to creativity and cleverness. However, that is not all that there is to it. As we all know, we live in a multi-screen world, and the ways that marketers tie these multiple screens together is impressive. One of the most popular ways, however, is to mention social media in television commercials. With today being among the most important days in television advertising, Matt McGee of Marketing Land took it upon himself to see just how many times these different social networks were mentioned in the many commercials of the Super Bowl.

According to his article, McGee counted a total of 52 Super Bowl ads played, and of these, about 32 mentioned a social media site in some form or another. What is very impressive is that Twitter was mentioned in 26 of the 52 advertisements, which came out to exactly 50%. According to an article by McGee from a year ago, Twitter only received 8 mentions during the Super Bowl of 2011, during which there were a total of 59 advertisements.

For Facebook, the numbers did not prove to be quite as impressive. Facebook, during 2011’s Super Bowl, also received 8 mentions from advertisers, making a tie game between the site and Twitter. However, this year Facebook only got mentioned in 4 advertisements in total. Of the total 52 advertisements, that equals out to about 7.7%. Needless to say, Facebook was not nearly as popular for Super Bowl advertisers.

Now, not long ago I wrote on Google Plus’s new found fame as the number 2 social network on the web. However, Super Bowl advertisers seem to think otherwise, as the network was not even mentioned once. Apparently, the network even fell behind YouTube and Instagram, networks that were both mentioned once during Super Bowl ads.

So, why is this important? Well, not only does it show what networks bigger, more popular brands think are the most important for their marketing efforts, but it also shows that the race between Twitter and Facebook is much tighter than any numbers can show. Facebook has always been viewed as number one for marketing, but Super Bowl advertisers seem to think that Twitter is the most important place to send ad viewers. Now, sure this is probably because these brands wanted people talking about their products live on Twitter during the game. However, I do doubt that none of these marketers were thinking further into the future, and trying to send consumers to Twitter to engage with them for a more long term period. Either way, one of the country’s largest advertising periods was dominated by Twitter today, and that needed to be recognized.

FTC Fines Company $800k

3

One of the most well-known abbreviations thrown around the web among digital marketers and online businesses is FTC. It seems that almost daily there is a new legal case between some company and the FTC, and the commission more often than not seems to come out on the better side of things. Such is the case with the recent legal suit between the FTC and Path, a social networking app that has been around since late 2010. It’s a social network that allows users to share their everyday lives with their friends, much like most of the other popular networks today. Also like these other networks, Path has recently run into some trouble with the FTC regarding their adhering to privacy guidelines. Apparently, according to Ad Age, Path has agreed to a settlement of $800,000 with the FTC, but this case has led to something new that will pertain to all mobile app developers, and furthermore mobile app marketers.

The settlement between the FTC and Path all began because the social network was alleged to have collected the personal information of children without the consent of a parent or guardian. As a social network, Path functions through their Path 2.0 app, in which is an Add Friends feature that is the cause for the debacle. With the feature, users have three options for adding friends: from phone contacts, from Facebook, or inviting friends through email or SMS. According to Ad Age, the company was collecting information such as first and last names, phone numbers, addresses, email addresses, and account names for other social networks from users’ contacts, despite these users having not opted to find friends through their contact lists. To top it off, the network lied to users by telling them that the only information that they collected included things like IP addresses and operating systems.

They collected this information from 3,000 users on their social network that were under that age of 13 years old. This is where they messed up big time. By doing this, Path had violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. Ad Age reports, “As part of the settlement, Path has agreed to privacy audits for the next 20 years and to establish a privacy program.”

With this legal settlement, the FTC released some guidelines for app developers to follow to better deal with security in developing mobile applications. This was obviously an effort to try to get rid of cases like these, where social users so clearly have their privacy violated.

In the company’s About page, they list a few of their core product features, a few of which are below. Clearly, they aren’t following their own rules.

Privacy
Path is private by default. You are always in control of your moments and who can see them.

Security
Your Path is securely stored in the Path cloud using world class technology and techniques.

Also, Path has since released an apology, stating that they are doing all they can to make the changes necessary to avoid the issue in the future. Here is part of that apology, as reported by Ad Age;

As you may know, we ask users’ their birthdays during the process of creating an account. However, there was a period of time where our system was not automatically rejecting people who indicated that they were under 13. Before the FTC reached out to us, we discovered and fixed this sign-up process qualification, and took further action by suspending any under age accounts that had mistakenly been allowed to be created.

 

Rifi Sachdev has great DNA for making money

4

Murray catches up with Rifi of CPADNA to talk a bit about why their CPA network is different than others – but more importantly, they don’t scrub. CPADNA is division of DedicatedMedia, one of the top ad networks in the world according to ComScore.edicated Networks is proud to present CPADNA, a top-tier affiliate network with the mission to drive optimum results, provide high quality service, and develop solid relationships for advertisers and affiliates through performance-based technology. With a winning combination of experienced staff and the finest network technology we take affiliate marketing to the next level.

Learn more about CPADNA and their offers here

Ted Dhanik: Media Buying Rocks Here

0

Ted Dhanik, the CEO of EngageBDR meets briefly with Murray to go over the Relaunch of First Impression, one of the top innovative products for media buying. They have re-launched the First Impression system this last December and it’s become the talk of almost all media buyers. What’s amazing about it is that it integrates many media buying tools including WhatRunsWhere.

Sarah D’Onofrio is Hot for Offers at Diablo Media

1

Affiliate Devil Sarah D’Onofrio talks about the hottest offers from Diablo Media, a company that has made a name for unique offers and products that they own. Great company to work with, great company to know and Sarah has been around for years with various companies making affiliates happy.

Affiliate Summit West Las Vegas Coverage Exclusively Sponsored by EngageBDR

Permission Data Grows Consumer Databases

23

Sabiha Tudesco of Permission Data talks about growing Consumer Databases for their clients. They specialize working with the top brands in the industry and creating quality relationships for their clients.  Permission Data has been around since 2002, and is one of the top companies in the database growth and opt-in industry and a company you should consider working with.

Affiliate Summit West Las Vegas Coverage Exclusively Sponsored by EngageBDR

Pinterest Not Useless for Brands

2

According to Ad Age, brands are really getting excited about some of the things they are learning about consumers through the use of Pinterest. Pinterest is a social network that nobody really expected to be useful in the marketing world, but then people began using it. When the site’s traffic rose to a significant number, which as of now seems to be somewhere around 27 million monthly active users, marketers and brands started to show interest. However, there really is not much marketers can do with the site, being that it’s functionality is much different from any other social network we see on the web today. An Ad Age article though, tells us that brands have found a successful way to use Pinterest’s countless images to their advantage, with the help of a few companies that put in a lot of time studying said images.

Since Pinterest has not released a public API, nor will it any time soon, brands and marketers have trouble finding useable information that will help them in their Pinterest marketing efforts. Therefore, as of now most brands simply act on the social network as any other user would, using Pinterest in the limited ways it can. This method is worth the effort since there is a considerably large user base on Pinterest, but it does not allow much room for effective marketing techniques. So, what brands and marketers needed was a way to get data from and about Pinterest users, without having any way to do it.

Even though the task seems like it would be impossible, or at least very difficult and time consuming, a few companies on the web have taken the time to help brands and businesses out with their Pinterest marketing, or at least gain some data from the things users are doing on the network. According to Ad Age, there is one company in particular, Curalate, that is helping brands out quite a bit with Pinterest image data. Apparently, to remedy the situation of no API from the social media site, Curalate goes through millions upon millions of images each day to gain information from it. Here is a better description of what they do, from Ad Age.

Curalate processes tens of millions of images each day, examining the pixels in each one to match it against images in its database to determine what the image is. Unlike tracking keyword-heavy text-based platforms, image laden sites such as Pinterest do not have many product SKUs or meta data associated with them, making for a daunting measurement task. Though people typically pin product images directly from e-commerce sites that do include such data, the information is lost and taken out of context once images of cableknit sweaters and gruyere-laced casseroles are added to their Pinterest pages.

From this process, brands receive some very useful information that Curalate finds. For example, many brands from things like energy, retail, and luxury have seen very exciting information, and are thrilled with the possibilities that information from Pinterest can create for them. “For instance, although many of the largest CPG brands don’t have much representation on Pinterest — think toothpaste and soap makers — food brands are big.”

What can be done with this data? Well, the CEO of Curalate, Apu Gupta, had a few suggestions. For example, companies can use analytics tools with the data and information they gain from companies like Curalate, and compare it to that of competitors. The example given is if information shows people love to post pictures of desserts or dessert recipes, then a food company may want to start developing dessert images and recipes for their website.

So, next time you hear that Pinterest is a useless social network for marketing purposes, think again. A lot can be gained from the way consumers behave on the social media site, and a lot of brands, businesses, and marketers are missing out.

Data, Dance, and Daring Campaigns: Erin Levzow’s Approach to Building Loyalty

0
How Mango Habanero, Metrics, and Masterful Moves Redefined Marketing Genius Every so often, a guest comes along who doesn’t just raise the bar—they throw it into orbit. Erin Levzow is one of those guests. From the moment she joined The ADOTAT Show, it was clear we were in the presence of brilliance. Erin is a marketing powerhouse, blending emotional intelligence with razor-sharp strategy, all wrapped in a package of humor, humility, and dazzling storytelling. She’s the...

Streaming’s Big Lie: The Future of TV Is Already Broke

0
Streaming was supposed to be the savior of TV—the rebellious new kid with no commercials, endless content, and an open bar of binge-worthy dopamine hits. But, as Doug Shapiro’s sharp, no-BS research reveals, the revolution is out of cash and looking for a loan. Streaming doesn’t just monetize less—it barely monetizes at all. For every streaming dollar generated, old-school pay TV is making it rain with three dollars in subscriber fees and seven dollars...

How to Narrow the Scope of Information Sought by an FTC Civil Investigative Demand (CID)

0
A civil investigative demand (“CID”) is the instrument by which the Federal Trade Commission exercises its compulsory process authority in connection with investigations.  CIDs may require the production of documents - including electronically stored information – or tangible things, the provision of testimony, and the providing of written responses to questions. A CID must state the nature of the conduct constituting the alleged violation which is under investigation and the provision of law applicable to...

Did Your Company Receive a Letter From the FTC?  FTC Warning Letters and Notices of Penalty Offense

0
Recipients of FTC warning letters and notices of penalty offense should be on high alert and act quickly. Their advertising and marketing practices could be in violation of applicable legal regulations. What is an FTC Warning Letter? Federal Trade Commission “warning letters” are intended to warn companies that their conduct is likely unlawful and that they can face serious legal consequences, such as a federal investigation or lawsuit, if they do not immediately stop. ...

The Good, the Bad, and the SPO-ly

0
The Hidden Flaws Behind Ad Tech’s Favorite Buzzword. Supply Path Optimization (SPO) is my love-hate relationship in ad tech personified. It’s the reason I fell for this industry’s maddening brilliance—and why it sometimes feels like a bad rom-com where no one learns their lesson. At its core, SPO promises efficiency, transparency, and accountability, and when it works, it’s like watching a Rube Goldberg machine perform flawlessly. But when it doesn’t—and let’s be honest, that’s most...