Lawyers Run The World Google to UK: Screw Your Laws!

Google to UK: Screw Your Laws!


- Advertisment -

Google was forced to pay $22.5 Million to settle a case against the US FTC concerning the cookie-privacy settings, which were circumvented in the Safari browser.  This was a complicated and well documented case which cost Google a significant amount of time and money, as well as required them to change how they used cookies in some cases.  Undoubtedly emboldened by the results of the case, Apple users in the UK have filed a civil lawsuit in the UK using the same facts.

In a surprising move by Google’s legal team, they responded by saying the case should be dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.  They argued that Google is not subject to UK privacy laws, and that the plaintiffs should have to come to California to re-file.   Google, which is based in California, is suggesting that even though they do business in the UK, they shouldn’t have to be subject to the laws of that country.

This goes against the way international law has worked for many years, and if the UK courts accept their request (which seems exceedingly unlikely), it would be a president that could be used in thousands of cases each year.  What it would essentially do is show that a company is only required to follow the laws of the territory where it is based out of, not the laws of the areas it does business in.  This odd ‘corporate diplomatic immunity’ would undoubtedly have very long reaching consequences.

What would happen if, for example, Google moved their headquarters to a country which allowed corporate espionage or other direct spying on customers (even more than is allowed in the US that is).  Countless other examples of why this is not the way international corporate law should work can be thought of, but when it comes to the legal system, you never know what is going to happen.

It certainly seems improbable that the UK courts would give up jurisdiction in this case, but it will be something everyone doing business online will want to keep their eyes on.  Even if the UK rejects this request by Google, it will make for an interesting response by the courts.

You can see the details of the FTC lawsuit HERE, and the civil lawsuit from the UK HERE.

What do you think about this case?  Is Google doing anything but stalling for time, or trying to cost the plaintiff money with these legal antics?  Please, comment below.

Pesach Lattin
Pesach Lattin
Pesach "Pace" Lattin is one of the top experts in interactive advertising, affiliate marketing. Pesach Lattin is known for his dedication to ethics in marketing, and focus on compliance and fraud in the industry, and has written numerous articles for publications from MediaPost, ClickZ, ADOTAS and his own blogs.


What's your opinion?

Latest news

Fortnite: The Ultimate Playground for Brands and Gamers

There’s a war going on, and it’s not just between the players. It’s a war for attention,...

The US Ad Industry Dodged the Recession Bullet

The winds of change often blow in unpredictable directions in the world of advertising, and as the...

RethinkFirst Unveils Seasoned SaaS Marketing Executive to Chart a Vision for the Future of Behavioral Health

RethinkFirst, a global health technology company at the forefront of the behavioral health industry, has made a...

Lead Generator Faces Millions in Monetary Penalties for Allegedly Violating FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule

On September 1, 2023, an Illinois federal court ruled in the matter of Federal Trade Commission v....

Will The Trade Desk Bankrupt SSPs?

Welcome to the wild and ever-wacky world of programmatic advertising, where the rules change as often as...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you